North Korea Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

AndrewJ

Junior Member
Registered Member
Look at shadows in the red circled areas, how is the fabric or plastic floating above water without anything to support?
View attachment 152773
Unlike the initial announcement, there were no holes made at the warship's bottom, the hull starboard was scratched and a certain amount of seawater flowed into the stern section through the rescue channel.
Experts estimated that it will take two or three days to keep the balance of the warship by pumping up the seawater from the flooded chamber and making the bow leave the slipway and 10-odd days to restore the warship's side.

The accident investigation group reported the relevant investigation content to the Central Military Commission of the Workers' Party of Korea on May 22.
The extent of damage to the warship is not serious and the result of the flooding process immediately after the accident is only information necessary to take practical rehabilitation measures. The above-said data have no connection with the cause of the accident and the identification of its responsibility.
It is necessary to make clear the cause of the accident.
No matter how good the state of the warship is, the fact that the accident is an unpardonable criminal act remains unchanged, and those responsible for it can never evade their responsibility for the crime.
Regarding this accident as a serous matter is not because of the damage to the warship or economic loss. The aim of doing so is to deal a telling blow to incautiousness, irresponsibility and unscientific empiricist attitude prevailing in any field and to sound an alarm bell.

From this image, can see the ship's front section and rear section are not in the same plane, so the ship is already broken & split apart from somewhere in the middle. And the keel has been twisted. That's why the blue cloth is there, to cover up the real damage positions, especially possible holes, cracks, etc.

It's the image not legit? Or Kim is lying? :oops:

Meanwhile, unscientific empiricist means someone failed to do a mission he once managed to do before. Did this small shipyard ever build & launch such a big ship before? The entire DPRK has never side-launched a such large ship. These reasons are nonsense. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:

sahureka

Junior Member
Registered Member
From another satellite photo one might think that the small vessel or barge indicated by the arrow was positioned in that position to prevent the destroyer from listing further to that side; it appears that the large command superstructure rests on it.

Screenshot_2025-05-23-11-00-34-309~2.jpeg
 

AndrewJ

Junior Member
Registered Member
From another satellite photo one might think that the small vessel or barge indicated by the arrow was positioned in that position to prevent the destroyer from listing further to that side; it appears that the large command superstructure rests on it.

View attachment 152793

What happend in the middle part? Look at position marked with purple pointer. The body indeed seems split apart in the middle. :oops:

nk.jpg
 
Top