North Korea Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

Atomicfrog

Major
Registered Member
The box-shaped block attached to the rear of the turret (which is protected by a steel mesh frame) is expected to be where they stored ammunition.
Extermal ATGM rack give a hint that it probably don't use Russian style gun launched-ATGMS. The box could be reload for the ATGM launcher or ammo for the maingun. It have volume for ammo in there for sure. not sure it look big enough for a full load of ammo tho.
 

TK3600

Major
Registered Member
Extermal ATGM rack give a hint that it probably don't use Russian style gun launched-ATGMS. The box could be reload for the ATGM launcher or ammo for the maingun. It have volume for ammo in there for sure. not sure it look big enough for a full load of ammo tho.
Question is if those can only be manual loaded from outside.
 

Gloire_bb

Captain
Registered Member
Launch of ATGM and from the images it also appears to be equipped with an active protection system (APS)
View attachment 126636
View attachment 126637
If i am right, lower right pic is quite interesting in the way how smoke grenade angle&fuze is set up (very high).
May actually be APS triggered, again much like T-14.
Seems to be 125mm since songun-ho.
It isn't that difficult to compare U-5ts(2a20/2a211) and D-81(2a26/46)-derived guns visually.
They're distinctive enough.

That makes little sense since Soviet 125mm uses two part ammunition. If you also use a manual loader it is going to have a really slow reload speed. Soviet 115mm is single piece ammunition.
There was 115mm 2a21, which used 2-part ammunition.
There are 120mm rifled UK(and Indian guns), using 2-parts ammo with human loader.
And certainly there is no legal prohibition to use single-piece ammo in 125mm gun.
 
Last edited:

Atomicfrog

Major
Registered Member
There was 115mm 2a21, which used 2-part ammunition.
There are 120mm rifled UK(and Indian guns), using 2-parts ammo with human loader.
And certainly there is no legal prohibition to use single-piece ammo in 125mm gun.
In a cramped place, two piece ammo are probably easier to load. You need a huge turret to turn a 125mm single piece around.
 

Gloire_bb

Captain
Registered Member
In a cramped place, two piece ammo are probably easier to load. You need a huge turret to turn a 125mm single piece around.
I don't think 125mm shot is especially longer than 115mm one (and both are shorter than Soviet 100mm AT single-piece one).
It's more of a chosen autoloader design requirement.

In any case - here it's outright visible which gun is installed, so there is no contradiction.
 

sahureka

Junior Member
Registered Member
North Korea paratrooper drill:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
PIC0079633.jpg

IL-76
PIC0079643.jpg


PIC0079635.jpg


note the type of parachute
PIC0079637.jpg


PIC0079639.jpg
 

Valiant 1002

Junior Member
Registered Member
I'm not sure about the practicality of this drill; They said that the hypothetical scenario here is to use these Il-76 aircrafts to drop large numbers of paratroopers behind enemy lines.

How could those planes survive flying into South Korean airspace with fighter jets and air defense systems waiting, while the North Korean air force is incapable of establishing air superiority?
 
Top