When it comes to propulsion and power generation, the PLAN surface combatant designers seem rather conservative. Isn't IPS (power by a combination of gas turbines and diesel generators) supposed to be the future for surface combatants in order to generate enough electricity whilst maintaining high cruise speed amid much reduced noice level?
The main concerns regarding the utilization of IEPS on surface combatants are with the entailed dimension, weight and complexity of the IEPS, which gets worse for smaller-sized ships than larger-sized ones.
That's why you don't see any FFGs or medium-sized DDGs with IEPS. At full load displacements, the Type 45s are more than 8000 tons, whereas the Zumwalts are more than 15000 tons - Both these DDGs run on IEPS.
Besides, there's also the completely justified concerns with reliability (which directly correlates to the maturity of technology). The PLAN certainly wouldn't want what happened to the six RN Type 45 DDGs to happen to her own future DDGs as well.
However, from a certain talk by PLAN Rear Admiral Zhao Dengping at the Northwestern Polytechnical University in Xi'an back in 2017:
One of the key focus for the development of future/next-generation DDGs include IEPS (综合电力推进).
Personally, I think that this (IEPS) is meant for the successor class to the 055 DDGs, regardless of whether said class will be classified as DDGs or CGs, given the anticipated size and displacement increase over the 055s. Meanwhile, the successor class to the 052D/DGs is more likely to be using CODLAG, judging on the deluge of academic papers and patent applications on CODLAG in the past many months.
Of course, depending on the level of maturity of China's IEPS and CODLAG development, alongside the needs of the PLAN for their future surface combatants, things are still subjected to change.