Next Generation DDG and FFG thread (after 055, 052D, 054B)

00CuriousObserver

00CuriousObserver

Senior Member
Registered Member
ACuriousPLAFan said:
Same case here as the claim of the simultaneous construction of 1x conventional-powered CV and 1x nuclear-powered CVN from earlier that was eventually proven to be wrong - Current information may become out-of-date with new/future developments.
Click to expand...

To be fair, that has not been proven wrong yet. The CV is/was "on hold" per Yankee.
 
A

ACuriousPLAFan

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
00CuriousObserver said:
To be fair, that has not been proven wrong yet. The CV is/was "on hold" per Yankee.
Click to expand...

Well, SOYO did mention an IPS (Integrated Power System) joint/integrated testing, evaluation, and debugging project corresponding to a ship with a displacement of 60000–80000 tons, where the lead organization for this project even constructed a dedicated testing facility some years ago. The most suitable (if not the only viable) warship with such a propulsion system at such displacements would be conventionally-powered CVs.

So that's something to observe, I suppose.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top