cloyce
Junior Member
I will be short.
1.The current chinese economy is a "external-oriented" type.
2.The rising asian superpower will threat the egemonic position of USA (and also some EU powers).
3.The USA may use any possible excuses to pose an embargo on China(free Tibet!), and get rid of all the debts.
I think PLAN really need to find a way to threat the US Carrier Battle Group in blue water.
PLAN SSKs have not enough endurance, current PLAN SSN are not enough silent, and the future PLAN carrier cannot match the numerical superiority of the US ones.
So, if the new chinese anti-ship ballistic missile system really works, why don't create a naval version? It would be a much cost-effective solution to couter a carrier battle group in open sea.
I'm not a ship designer, but I've made some concept cruiser.
Just have a look, and tell what's right and what'ss wrong.
Double hull design to maximize the width
NAVAL SUPER OTH RADAR WITH 2000km RANGE!
28 DF-21C missiles
Intelligent exhaust gas release holes
1.The current chinese economy is a "external-oriented" type.
2.The rising asian superpower will threat the egemonic position of USA (and also some EU powers).
3.The USA may use any possible excuses to pose an embargo on China(free Tibet!), and get rid of all the debts.
I think PLAN really need to find a way to threat the US Carrier Battle Group in blue water.
PLAN SSKs have not enough endurance, current PLAN SSN are not enough silent, and the future PLAN carrier cannot match the numerical superiority of the US ones.
So, if the new chinese anti-ship ballistic missile system really works, why don't create a naval version? It would be a much cost-effective solution to couter a carrier battle group in open sea.
I'm not a ship designer, but I've made some concept cruiser.
Just have a look, and tell what's right and what'ss wrong.
Double hull design to maximize the width
NAVAL SUPER OTH RADAR WITH 2000km RANGE!
28 DF-21C missiles
Intelligent exhaust gas release holes