@Janiz he doesn't have anything to back it up .. as usual
Not only that they run faster they also run smoother Here is the ultimate coin test on Chinese vs Germany Highspeed train. See it for yourself who make better train
I don't see any problem with terminating the contract as long as the agreement allowed it to do that.I don't believe Siemens is that stupid. They must calculate that it is still profitable for them to sell the Chinese HRSG knowing it will be RE. I don't remember it well but I don't think they terminate it after 13 order
Come on, that is a blatantly different favorable setup on the Chinese train. Not comparable. And arguably the guy seems to be barely trying on the German train.
OK saw the newer posts but still.
Not only that they run faster they also run smoother Here is the ultimate coin test on Chinese vs Germany Highspeed train. See it for yourself who make better train
I don't see any problem with terminating the contract as long as the agreement allowed it to do that.I don't believe Siemens is that stupid. They must calculate that it is still profitable for them to sell the Chinese HRSG knowing it will be RE. I don't remember it well but I don't think they terminate it after 13 order
Come on, that is a blatantly different favorable setup on the Chinese train. Not comparable. And arguably the guy seems to be barely trying on the German train.
OK saw the newer posts but still.
Although, I agree the testing condition should be similar, the setup on the Chinese train isn't necessary the more favorable one since you have unsymmetrical vibration forces acting on the bottom and side of the coin.
From a operaters POV I should imaginine it would be the bottom line which determines which train was the more preferable.