Mystery aircraft 4th August 2025: CCA vs other

mack8

Junior Member
J-36’s wings have forward swept trailing edges, this one doesn’t.

Then go look at pictures of the J-36 with undercarriage down. Look at the distance between front and main landing gear, using another part of the J-36 for reference (e.g. leading edge of wing). Let me know what differences you see in the distance between landing gear on J-36 vs. the picture of “G/J-XD3”.

And isn’t there anyone who’s willing to try approximate the size using one of the blurry wheels please?
Could you expand a bit on what you think this aircraft is/is for?
 

GTI

Junior Member
Registered Member
Could you expand a bit on what you think this aircraft is/is for?
All I’m trying to do for now is establish its rough size.

Anything J-35 size and above I’d say is definitely manned. However this honestly looks bigger than that to me. Plus the double / triple main landing gear bogie.

For now I’m just going off of what I see, which is a very big plane. I’m not hearing any credible challenges as to its size (caveat being picture quality as usual). If the picture is real and the main landing gear is actually that bulky, then it can only be one thing... I’m just not ready to say it as I / we need more evidence.
 

mack8

Junior Member
All I’m trying to do for now is establish its rough size.

Anything J-35 size and above I’d say is definitely manned. However this honestly looks bigger than that to me. Plus the double / triple main landing gear bogie.

For now I’m just going off of what I see, which is a very big plane. I’m not hearing any credible challenges as to its size (caveat being picture quality as usual). If the picture is real and the main landing gear is actually that bulky, then it can only be one thing... I’m just not ready to say it as I / we need more evidence.
I asked because i'm very curious what others think it is and i'm even curiouser now lol. Can't you give us your hunch as to what you think it is, could it be something more exotic that what we've been speculating here? Aerospaceplane?
 

Nx4eu

Junior Member
Registered Member
J-36’s wings have forward swept trailing edges, this one doesn’t.

Then go look at pictures of the J-36 with undercarriage down. Look at the distance between front and main landing gear, using another part of the J-36 for reference (e.g. leading edge of wing). Let me know what differences you see in the distance between landing gear on J-36 vs. the picture of “G/J-XD3”.

And isn’t there anyone who’s willing to try approximate the size using one of the blurry wheels please?
I did the wheel measurements I think it's pretty safe to say this is not a H-20 Variant. The measurements almost match exactly with the J-36 Wheel size to length ratio. And I'd like to point out that the main gears look like the same kind of double bogey on the J-36 but with the landing gear door sticking out ahead, which may make it appear to be a triple bogey.
 

GTI

Junior Member
Registered Member
I did the wheel measurements I think it's pretty safe to say this is not a H-20 Variant. The measurements almost match exactly with the J-36 Wheel size to length ratio. And I'd like to point out that the main gears look like the same kind of double bogey on the J-36 but with the landing gear door sticking out ahead, which may make it appear to be a triple bogey.
Thanks. Did you happen to try and do a comparison to the wingspan (at least what we can see of the wings from that orientation)?

If it’s at least roughly J-36 size (and real, of course), then a J-36 with such redesigned wings / a totally new aircraft in the same size category as J-36 would be remarkable.
 

Deino

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
I did the wheel measurements I think it's pretty safe to say this is not a H-20 Variant. The measurements almost match exactly with the J-36 Wheel size to length ratio. And I'd like to point out that the main gears look like the same kind of double bogey on the J-36 but with the landing gear door sticking out ahead, which may make it appear to be a triple bogey.


Would you post your analysis here? In fact i tried the same - albeit not with calculations and measurement, but just by eye-balling the J-36's front landing gear tyre to a size similar to the unknown type.

I'm well aware this inherits several errors from the beginning since we don't know if the size of the tires are the same, eyeballing itself is far from good ... but at least since we are all fishing in a muddy pond! Here is my try ...

I must admit, my first impression was this "thing" is bigger - or at least longer than a J-36 ... so indeed more something big.
Then I found the image in the bottom left corner and my first thought was, these two are too similar, maybe it is a fake too ... if I wouldn't know better and both images were posted let's say about two years apart, I would say that "thing" from yesterday is a dramatically refined version of the J-36, but that does not make any sense at all!

maybe CCA vs J-36 - 2.jpg
 
Last edited:

Deino

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Until the mystery of than new "thing" seen yesterday is solved I think we should separate all "what is it" discussion containing a lot of speculations from the regular "Chinese UCAV/CCA/flying wing drones (ISR, A2A, A2G) thread" and continue it here until we know what it is:

I'll start with the transfer of all posts to this new thread and until then I hope you don't mind!
 
Last edited:
Top