First I must admit that without having watched it, I could be very wrong. I am not to dismiss the movie's achievement either. But rather, I'd want to categorize it's position.
From what I glimpsed the trailers I must say this is not in the same league as other sci-fi like Gravity, Interstellar and Martian, but closer to something like Star War still great depends on one's taste.
Gravity and Martian are almost 100% based on known and verified technologies, the only thing makes them fiction is because nobody has done it. They can be done using today's technology even with a very small chance of success.
Interstellar has more fiction than the two above due to the fact that many of black hole's phenomenons are calculated by theory, not observed and proven yet. But the calculation is right according today's knowledge. The other fictional part is the knowledge of building anti-gravity vehicle based on unknown knowledge of black hole. I'd say Interstellar is 20% fiction and 80% scientific.
Now, how much of TWE's technology and astronomical subjects are based on known Scientifics? I mean, an unknow scientific premise is a fiction today even if it could be proven in the future.
From what I glimpsed the trailers I must say this is not in the same league as other sci-fi like Gravity, Interstellar and Martian, but closer to something like Star War still great depends on one's taste.
Gravity and Martian are almost 100% based on known and verified technologies, the only thing makes them fiction is because nobody has done it. They can be done using today's technology even with a very small chance of success.
Interstellar has more fiction than the two above due to the fact that many of black hole's phenomenons are calculated by theory, not observed and proven yet. But the calculation is right according today's knowledge. The other fictional part is the knowledge of building anti-gravity vehicle based on unknown knowledge of black hole. I'd say Interstellar is 20% fiction and 80% scientific.
Now, how much of TWE's technology and astronomical subjects are based on known Scientifics? I mean, an unknow scientific premise is a fiction today even if it could be proven in the future.
Last edited: