Miscellaneous News
- Thread starter bd popeye
- Start date
I believe Murdoch/Fox news own basically all the major news/media in Australia which has been beating the war propaganda for a decade. Maybe he has some mental trauma from his ex-wife (who sorta sounded like a gold digger, but he should realize that when a young lady has intrest in a skeleton).
Anyways, the war drum continues to beat. IMO, East Asian Countries need to wake up and force non-asian forces out of Asia, as the intrest of the foreigners is to destabilize the region. Asia has teh population and skills to dominate the world economy and culture. This is a real threat to the Anglo (auss, us, uk) and to lesser extent europe ( i think most don't really care of world domination anymre)
China needs to help decoupling by banning ALL exports to Australia.
No Chinese goods should be allowed to be exported to Australia.
Although I agree with your position, in my analysis, it’ll never get this far.
I anticipate that, if, and when, China deems it necessary to use (limited) military means to effect unification, the military options available to the US will have been severely diminished, pre-emptively, as a result China’s timely declaration of a “north-western-Pacific facilitating-nation decapitation” (for lack of a better term) policy.
Most of y’all know exactly what this means; but for those that don’t: any north-western-Pacific nation, i. e., Japan, S Korea, and Philippines, that allows any asset within their national territory, or under their national control, to be used, in any way, to facilitate any attack against China, or to facilitate the defense of any asset used in such attack, shall be considered as an existential threat to Chinese sovereignty and will suffer political and economic decapitation, i. e., decimation of Capitol and Capital (and, of course, to Capitalists, it’s the latter that’s most important).
Again, I return to my thesis that China’s pre-eminence in the north-western-Pacific derives from the forced nullification of the US-Lackey military alliances. Being that the US would survive all but the most drastic escalations, but the Lackeys wouldn’t survive a hyper-intense conventional/cyber campaign, the most expedient means to break these alliances would be to ensure the Lackeys of their destruction should they align in any military campaign against China’s core issues.
And, once the US can’t count on foreign cannon-fodder for it’s adventurism, we’ll see that its taste for adventure will diminish, greatly!
Last edited:
Why are some members of the forum reacting positively to this?
Taliban is irrational. This is deja vu all over. Remember when Assads Syria and Iraq was destroyed and chaos all around? You got ISIS.
The Taliban and ISIS are from the same families.Are the ideologies of Taliban and ISIS much different? I don't think so. They scream the same stuff. The ISIS were stupid / reckless enough to consider a Global war.
How long till Taliban sits up and thinks "OK brothers, it's time to help ETIM in China towards their liberation?" PLA must be ready to wipe out them. No ethics. No morals. A show of strength and carnage.
Sometimes, enemy of your enemy is NOT your friend.
You are getting too emotional. Its just business. No neighbour of Afghanistan wants it to become unstable.
With the US military clearly planned to retreat from the country, the Taliban are naturally the strongest force. The official Gov of Afghanistan is pathetic and too much influenced by the US.
As mentioned in previous posts, Talibans are open to cooperating with China and other neighbors in order to build up Afghanistan.
Its a win-win for all sides involved
If even after all this Uighurs "genocide" propaganda, Talibans are still not against China, then that shows how much they care about their relationship with China.
If the Taliban think that the Chinese are as merciful to their enemies as the US was to them, then lol, they must be dreaming. If the Chinese react with such intensity and harsh measures to their own population in Xinjiang then i dont want to know what they will be willing to do to Afghanistan if they get highly provoked and attacked constantly
All this is ofc just some theories. China is looking for win-win with Afghanistan. Taliban understand this, which is why you see them being so cooperative with China.
Last edited:
In this case, no. I'm not getting emotional at all.
This isn't win-win. I see clouds of doom.
You have to read up on Taliban. It's basically a student outfit that created a very potent cocktail of religious war and afghan nationalism. Then there is AL-Qaeda which badge themselves as defenders of religion against big tyrants ( USSR, US).
ISIS is way humble - Just religion. That's it. You see, there is an ISIS within every Taliban and AL-Qaeda. Taliban is trying to build up strength by showing its Afghan nationalist side for the time being. Once they become the De facto government and get access to trade, the leaders within will drop the show and reveal their religion oriented goal - Islamic State of Afghanistan and Asia Central (ISAAC) whatever ( got a ring to it).
Pakistan, India, China, Turkmenistan... All are going to be affected. Their target one would be Pakistan ( to get them nukes somehow) . India and China would be next target.
(Kashmir and Xinjiang).
solarz
Brigadier
Taliban and ISIS are completely different. If they weren't, the US wouldn't be negotiating with the Taliban.
The Taliban was the government of Afghanistan before they were ousted by the US. Like them or not, they enjoy widespread support in the Afghan countryside. The Kabul puppet regime is corrupt and incompetent, they are incapable of holding power independently.
Therefore, it doesn't matter what you think of the Taliban, someone will be filling the vacuum of a US withdrawal.
What makes you think the Taliban is going to be any worse for China than having the US there?