Miscellaneous News

iewgnem

Captain
Registered Member
You are talking like Windows is the only OS and open source OS doesn't exist. Linux and derivatives do exist which are secure and completely open for inspection so that no software backdoor can exist. The OS acts as the central authority, controlling the CPU's privilege levels. Even drivers loaded from a chip must ask the OS for permission to access resources, like sending data packets. Its completely impossible for any backdoor piece of code to gain access to the network interface without OS permission.

Firewalls (both host and network-based) monitor all outbound traffic. A hardware backdoor trying to exfiltrate data would still need to use the Network Interface Card and transmit data, which network boundary firewalls and Intrusion Detection Systems are specifically designed to flag as unauthorized communication.

Finally, its too risky for a trillion dollar company to implement such a backdoor. The reputational damage will be too huge. We are talking the entire world and most of the top corps no longer trusting NVDIA products. Then there could be criminal charges and fines. NVDIA execs in China could be arrested for example. No company can justify doing these things. they would rather leak this to the outside world even if US govt forces them to do it.

There is tendency to come up with conspiracy theories against US where everything has a backdoor and CIA is all powerful entity that can spy on anything. When you think logically, you can see its all just BS.
You're just saying your average app programmer or 3rd year writing Pyhton can't build backdoors, and that's true, but real backdoors operate at microcode level, data that gets injected by the separate hardware on the chip, between the compute unit and I/O unit, or just code that make use of vulnerabilities that might or might not be known. Saying firewalls can prevent backdoors is like saying you're safe from spying because you installed a lock on your door: someone who want to spy on you ain't knocking asking to be let in.

That's not to say having controlled hardware everywhere is meaningless, it certainly makes the job much harder if every layer between the GPU and reporting server runs on Huawei metal, but again counter-espionage isn't about what you know, its protecting against what you don't, and the only way to protect against what you don't know is not use Nvidia chips to begin with.

As for reputation, lol, you're talking about people who openly brag about installing backdoors, these are not people who care about reputation at home, and they're also people who already lost their reputation from China's perspective, e.g. Nvidia might get banned if they have backdoors, aannd they were banned.
 

Phead128

Major
Staff member
Moderator - World Affairs
You're just saying your average app programmer or 3rd year writing Pyhton can't build backdoors, and that's true, but real backdoors operate at microcode level, data that gets injected by the separate hardware on the chip, between the compute unit and I/O unit, or just code that make use of vulnerabilities that might or might not be known. Saying firewalls can prevent backdoors is like saying you're safe from spying because you installed a lock on your door: someone who want to spy on you ain't knocking asking to be let in.

That's not to say having controlled hardware everywhere is meaningless, it certainly makes the job much harder if every layer between the GPU and reporting server runs on Huawei metal, but again counter-espionage isn't about what you know, its protecting against what you don't, and the only way to protect against what you don't know is not use Nvidia chips to begin with.

As for reputation, lol, you're talking about people who openly brag about installing backdoors, these are not people who care about reputation at home, and they're also people who already lost their reputation from China's perspective, e.g. Nvidia might get banned if they have backdoors, aannd they were banned.

Nvidia just needs to give a shitty firmware update that "accidentally" overclocks and overheats the AI GPU and only release in a geofenced region (mainland China) using tracking tech in times of US-China war. No backdoor needed. Stunex worm overclocked the motors of the Iranian nuclear centrifuges causing to spin so fast, it exploded, while reporting back "normal RPM". This set Iran nuke program back years, thanks to CIA-Israeli joint sabotage effort. Definitely plausible. CIA aims to sabotage Iran and China, exfiltrating terabytes of whatever GPU is training on is not feasible or informative info. Why spy when you can make boom?
 

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General

I was wondering why this NYTimes video sounds so much like Palmer Luckey… because he paid for it. This is the guy pushing a new and cheaper military manufacturing for the US that could be done in any factory in the US and yet he opening Anduril’s first factory in Japan? Then I hear one of his drones is going to cost well over a hundred thousand dollars. Well China can knock out his factory in Japan with a hundred thousand dollar hypersonic missile. I wonder if Luckey and Alex Karp like playing Samurai over the weekend during their time off.
 

Bellum_Romanum

Brigadier
Registered Member

I was wondering why this NYTimes video sounds so much like Palmer Luckey… because he paid for it. This is the guy pushing a new and cheaper military manufacturing for the US that could be done in any factory in the US and yet he opening Anduril’s first factory in Japan? Then I hear one of his drones is going to cost well over a hundred thousand dollars. Well China can knock out his factory in Japan with a hundred thousand dollar hypersonic missile. I wonder if Luckey and Alex Karp like playing Samurai over the weekend during their time off.
Alex Karp you said?

Well, here ya go sensei!

[UScreenshot_2025-12-10-17-12-04-89_680d03679600f7af0b4c700c6b270fe7.jpgRL unfurl="true"]
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

supersnoop

Colonel
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Critics said it risked weakening the country’s role in combating the threat from China, which now has the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and is increasingly aggressive towards Taiwan and other nearby rivals.
...
James Cartlidge, the shadow defence secretary, said: “We all know the real reason Labour are slashing overseas training for the Armed Forces – to save money.

1. Hilarious that he pretends like the UK would actually have some role in "combating the threat from China". Even if the UK had real intentions on intervening in Asia, it really should be China who is asking why a country multiple oceans away is calling it a "threat".

2. Without a doubt, if his party were in power, he'd likely make the same cuts to save money and probably cite that China is too far away to be a threat...
 
Top