Miscellaneous News

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
I forgot if it was someone on this forum or Weibo comments section who mentioned that he had “a friend” who went to India and treated the lower caste porter very nicely and gave a very good tip. When they went to the hotel room, the porter not only did not respond gratefully but attempted to rape him! Luckily he is a gym bro and held off the attack before anything serious could happen. Basically, the porter was used to getting treated like dirt and when he got doted on for the first time in his life, he assumed that the Chinese man must be a male prostitute and even lower on the totem pole than he was.

I think that pretty much sums up the sort of mentality China is dealing with here.
I laughed for like 3 minutes at the bold part before I could compose myself to respond. There's a LOT going on there. The Indian was gay, assumed that the Chinese guy was also gay, and and went ahead with the rape attempt anyway despite the other guy being a muscular gym bro? LOL It's hard to wrap your head around all that...
 

vidpicurl

New Member
Registered Member
I laughed for like 3 minutes at the bold part before I could compose myself to respond. There's a LOT going on there. The Indian was gay, assumed that the Chinese guy was also gay, and and went ahead with the rape attempt anyway despite the other guy being a muscular gym bro? LOL It's hard to wrap your head around all that...
It's very possible that the Indian guy isn't gay though. It's very common for heterosexual males to become sexually attracted to other males when heterosexual sex isn't available. If it's somewhere else I probably won't bother saying this but this is a military forum, and this fact is very relevant to military and therefore I believe is interesting info for people here. In many cases, military service is a circumstance where there are a lot of males who don't have access to heterosexual sex. Indecent homosexual activities as a result of this is a recurring problem that all militaries around the world need to deal with. A sidenote: male prostitutes in underdeveloped economies like India are also very often not gay.
 

coldplayer1002

Just Hatched
Registered Member
Offend Japan? Modi has gotten his priorities wrong yet again. Who is more important for India's future? China or Japan? If Modi is as predicted, too afraid to embrace this truth, then nothing meaningful is gonna happen for India in the foreseeable future. Off course, India is only begining to build trust with China. But whose fault was that to destroy this trust? It wasn't China's fault, that's for sure.

It is my opinion that India will never truly fulfill any of it's potential as long as Modi and the same old elites are in charge. All this realignment with China is just theater for the Americans to watch and squirm for awhile. Then Modi will one day go to the US and capitulate. And then it's back to business as usual.
India and China have a significant deficit of political mutual trust. In fact, from Foreign Minister Wang Yi's visit to India to Prime Minister Modi's participation in the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit, it is evident that not many substantive agreements were reached between the two countries. Although some Indian media outlets, such as ANI, claimed that China would lift restrictions on exports of rare earths, fertilizers, and shield tunneling machines to India, this was almost immediately denied by the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs. If you observe Modi's behavior at the SCO summit closely, you will notice his strong awareness of the camera and his focus on political performance. In one particular shot, he practically pulled Russian President Putin by the hand to meet with Xi Jinping, and then grasped Xi's hand, creating a photo opportunity that suggested trilateral cooperation between China, Russia, and India. This was almost entirely a political performance for the United States. Some Indian media also collaborated in publicizing this. Indian diplomacy has a tradition of seeking to be on good terms with all sides, somewhat akin to Vietnam's "bamboo diplomacy." However, India has not executed this well. Despite being viewed by the West as an alternative to China, India's performance has been poor. The India-Pakistan air combat on May 7th further demonstrated that India lacks true hegemonic power in South Asia. Because of this conflict, it is impossible for India to align with China's narrative in its public messaging, as this would easily be interpreted as India kneeling or surrendering to China (especially after the air conflict), particularly when it has not gained any real economic or political benefits from Beijing. Furthermore, India is counting on investment and aid from the West to counterbalance China. It is therefore inconceivable that India would attend a military parade where the leaders of China, Russia, and North Korea are all present—and you can now see how the United States and the European Union view that parade. Additionally, Japan has a genuine and strong interest in investing in India, a sentiment reflected in public opinion, media reports, and high-level political commitments. Japan is arguably the economy with the most capability and willingness to invest in India at present. Modi certainly has no reason to offend Japan.
 

FriedButter

Brigadier
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Trump defends sanctions on India over Russian oil purchases, warns of ‘phase two, phase three’​

US President Donald Trump defended sanctions on India over Russian oil purchases, warned “phase two” and “phase three” could follow. He said the tariffs cost Russia “hundreds of billions”.

US President Donald Trump on Wednesday (September 3) said he had imposed secondary sanctions on India for buying Russian oil and warned of further steps, indicating that “phase two” and “phase three” were still on the table.

During a meeting with Polish President at the Oval Office, Trump grew visibly irritated when a Polish journalist suggested he had expressed frustration with Russian President Vladimir Putin but taken no action.

“How do you know there’s no action? Would you say that putting secondary sanctions on India, the largest purchaser outside of China, they’re almost equal, would you say there was no action? That cost hundreds of billions of dollars to Russia. You call that no action? And I haven’t done phase two yet or phase three,” Trump said.

He added sharply: “But when you say there’s no action, I think you ought to get yourself a new job.”

Trump underscored that India had been cautioned weeks earlier.

“Two weeks ago, I said, if India buys, India’s got big problems, and that’s what happens. So, don’t tell me about that,” he said.

The President also linked his broader strategy to Moscow and its allies, saying, “I’ve already done that with regard to India, and we’re doing it with regard to other things.”

Trump has already slapped 25% reciprocal tariffs on India, alongside another 25% levy specifically targeting Delhi’s purchases of Russian oil. The combined 50% tariff package took effect on August 27.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi responded firmly, stressing that India’s domestic priorities would not be compromised.

“I can’t compromise on the interests of farmers, cattle-rearers, small-scale industries. Pressure on us may increase, but we will bear it,” PM Modi said.
 

Randomuser

Captain
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
I wonder how many people actually forsaw this.

We know Trump is eventually going to be antagonistic against anyone who gets in his way of doing things. But it feels like right now he's taking the gloves off to give a real hard beating for the world to see. Even I didn't see him being that aggressive this early.

And since not many except Indians themselves are gonna step in for India, there's not much to stop him from continuing. It almost gets him free support in a way.
 
Top