Miscellaneous News

pmc

Colonel
Registered Member
Fighting high intensity combat for 3 years is what doing looks like. Unlike US giving up after 1 month against yemen and 2 weeks against Iran.

Who else has fought a war for 3 years in the last 50 years? No one. No US insurgency fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq doesn't count.
It certainly not high intensity combat. It only to extent that Zelenski government stays afloat per agreement with former Israeli Prime Minister. once that agreement expires than it will switch to effective combat. No one knows the full content of that agreement.
Saudis have opened new embassy in Moscow sign of increase confidence. This wont happen unless what i described above.
 

pmc

Colonel
Registered Member
If I'm being honest with you, it sounds like a whole bunch of excuses to me. Like someone said earlier, they need to stop talking and start doing.
You are commenting on things that you have not properly researched. Russia is developing its human capital to run new Arabic empire.
for this to happen it has to finish off the fifth column inside its society. They already blame Azeri for them. Iran supreme leader and President are Azeri decent. it tell you that the system of these people cannot be trusted in conflict with West. Even today Russia can forcefully decouple Asia, Europe and Africa.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Did Washington recruit former Iranian Foreign Minister​

Zarif?​


1751730799158.png
 

pmc

Colonel
Registered Member
No, Russia is quite strong.

People didn't realize 2 things. Modern armies are too tiny to fight major countries and win easily. The last big wars that happened during the cold war and ww2 had millions of soldiers. Russia only started with 150k. All Ukraine had to do was mobilize its reserves and Russia was outnumbered.

Secondly, drone warfare has made armored warfare completely useless. In the past the expectation was, armored maneuver warfare was the way to go. Now it's back ww1 style grind.

If you compare Russian strength in terms of military production, force reconstitution and economic resilience against western sanctions, its pretty obviously no one in Europe or western vassals like Japan or Korea can come close to this level of military strength.

Only China, US and Russia are on this level.
China and US cannot mobilize 700,00k troops (It does not mean they all Russian) with rotation for this long. behind this mobilization and rotation is thousands of helicopters and hundreds of transport plans and highly distributed air warfare from low altitude attack choppers and Su-25SM. 2m with speed of 224 km/hr.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

FriedButter

Brigadier
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

RFK Jr. Says AI Will Approve New Drugs at FDA ‘Very, Very Quickly’​

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. appeared on the latest episode of Tucker Carlson’s podcast on Monday and it’s filled with the ramblings of a man completely detached from reality. Kennedy falsely suggested vaccines cause autism, more or less endorsed the idea that Anthony Fauci should go to prison, and says that AI will allow the FDA to approve new drugs very quickly. It’s quite a mess.

These absolutely unhinged ideas wouldn’t be such a problem if this were any other fringe lunatic appearing on the podcast of a racist former Fox News host. But Kennedy happens to be the Secretary of Health and Human Services, a man who’s been given enormous power over America’s entire healthcare system thanks to President Donald Trump.

One of the most troubling moments in the new interview comes when Kennedy discusses the role that artificial intelligence is going to play in replacing or altering the VAERS system, which stands for Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. VAERS allows doctors to report incidents when they believe a patient has been harmed by vaccines, but Kennedy isn’t happy with it. The secretary insists it was “designed to fail,” suggesting it’s not registering enough people who in his mind have been harmed by vaccines over the years.

“We’re going to absolutely change VAERS and we’re going to make it, we’re going to create either within VAERS or supplementary to VAERS, a system that actually works,” Kennedy said. “And, you know, right now, even that system is antiquated because we have access to AI.”

Kennedy told Carlson he was creating an “AI revolution” at the Department of Health and Human Services and was attracting the top people from Silicon Valley who “walked away from billion dollar businesses.” But Kennedy says these people don’t want prestige or power, they just want to make the healthcare system better.

“We are at the cutting edge of AI,” Kennedy said. “We’re implementing it in all of our departments. At FDA, we’re accelerating drug approvals so that you don’t need to use primates or even animal models. You can do the drug approvals very, very quickly with AI.”

Kennedy has previously talked about using AI to increase efficiency at FDA but hasn’t provided details about what AI tools will be used and how they would be used to approve new drugs. But given generative AI’s instability and propensity for failing at some of the most basic tasks, the idea of putting drug approvals in the hands of robots is pretty terrifying.

Kennedy, who was the founder of an anti-vaccine group called the Children’s Health Defense, says repeatedly during the interview that vaccines have never been properly studied, which is just a flat-out lie. But he now has the power to demand investigations into vaccines that will get him the results he wants, no matter how much he insists his own opinion doesn’t matter.

“We need to stop trusting the experts, right?” Kennedy told Carlson. “We were told at the beginning of COVID, don’t look at any data yourself, don’t do any investigation yourself, just trust the experts. And trusting the experts is not a feature of science, it’s not a feature of democracy, it’s a feature of religion, and it’s a feature of totalitarianism.”

Kennedy went on to insist that it was important for everyone to “do your own research,” a common refrain among those in the so-called Make America Healthy Again movement. But Kennedy is intentionally misrepresenting the role of experts in an informed society. Listening to experts isn’t about abandoning all critical thinking. It’s about recognizing that there are areas where you may not have expertise and taking the opinions of medical professionals more seriously than random people on shows like Joe Rogan and Tucker Carlson who are just self-proclaimed experts.

Kennedy was asked several leading questions from Carlson, including whether the covid-19 vaccine has killed more people than it saved. And Kennedy is skilled enough as a communicator (his father was Attorney General during his uncle’s presidency, as he frequently mentions) that he can avoid directly answering in the affirmative while subtly telling you that he believes it’s the case.

Notice, for instance, how Kennedy initially responds to Carlson’s question while eventually working his way to sowing doubt about trust in vaccines.
Kennedy is often effective at manipulating an audience, but also says things that don’t make any sense, even if you agree with his worldview. At one point during his interview with Carlson he said that when Pfizer’s covid-19 vaccine was studied there were two people who died in the control group and one person who died in the vaccine group.

“You remember they were saying the vaccine is 100% effective? Well, that’s why they were saying it because there was… there was… two is 100% of one,” Kennedy said.

That’s not how anyone is measuring the efficacy of vaccines. Yes, some of the early studies were admittedly too rosy in their projections, especially those in early 2021 as the vaccines were first released. But nobody was claiming that two people dying in a control group and one person dying in the vaccine group showed the vaccine was 100% effective. That math isn’t anything that was actually presented in any study Gizmodo is aware of.

Kennedy was also asked about whether Anthony Fauci, the nation’s most visible public health expert during the covid-19 pandemic, would be prosecuted for some unspecified crimes. Again, the secretary danced around a bit with his language but then heavily suggested Fauci should be tried for criminal acts. Kennedy said there should be some kind of “truth commission” for covid-19 vaccines like the truth and reconciliation commissions in South Africa and Central America in the 20th century under repressive governments.

“Anybody who comes and volunteers to testify truthfully is then given immunity from prosecution. And, but, so that at least the public knows who did what,” Kennedy said. “And people who are called and don’t take that deal and purge themselves, they then can be, they can be prosecuted criminally.”
“We are at the cutting edge of AI,” Kennedy said. “We’re implementing it in all of our departments. At FDA, we’re accelerating drug approvals so that you don’t need to use primates or even animal models. You can do the drug approvals very, very quickly with AI.”
 

CMP

Senior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
In other words, the drug trials are going to be conducted on the public at large. Moving forward, don't trust any medication being prescribed for you until you do your own investigation to see if it was trialed and approved before or after 2025. The things approved in 2025 and beyond are going to result in a shit show of side effects.
 

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General
Here is the achieved version of the Thomas L. Friedman article above:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Two articles mentioned by Friedman in his article above:
  • From The Wall Street Journal:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
  • A report about China's electrification - China is becoming the world's first "electrostate".
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

What happened to how much energy a country is producing as a sign of how well a country's economy is doing? Just like they use car production as a tea-leaf indicator of how well the US economy is doing, it doesn't mean the same when the Chinese car industry is beating Western auto sales around the world. Green energy and the environmental issues are so important to Western liberals that they'll paint it under the context of a life and death struggle for the planet... until China comes out as leader of its technological drive and progress. Maybe that'll be an argument against Chinese taking the lead on anything. If Chinese take a commanding position on something that's good for all, that'll make most of the West turn working against it, so that's why China shouldn't be doing better on something that is good than the West.
 
Top