Ignoring American inability to execute, I think this is a great idea, the countries that gets dragged via treaty into war with China can't actually contribute much to the US, but they can contribute a lot to China by offering up their islands or homeland to China, e.g. A Chinese occupation of Australia would have a lot better optics if its in response to Australia declaring war on China.
Miscellaneous News
- Thread starter bd popeye
- Start date
AssassinsMace
Lieutenant General
Yes it's time the Jews get a taste of their own medicine. Just repeat what they say about China and replace it with "Jews" or "Israel" and they'll scream antisemitism bloody murder. Apparently Rahm Emanuel is being pushed to be the next Democrat Presidential candidate. The Democrats don't learn their lesson. More of the same crony Democrat politics especially when he's being pushed by the likes of Nancy Pelosi. We just heard from blow-with-the-wind Elizabeth Economy admit Trump's tariffs on China was a negative on the US economy but Biden continued it because like I recall years ago mentioning in here that Biden and the Democrats were more concern about looking like they were in league with China and the Republicans were going to exploit it. Damn what best for the US and Americans. So the only thing Democrats have that they can say is theirs is DEI. I'm not talking the feel-good-including-everyone front they hide it behind to get everyone on board. I'm talking what they were actually practicing and only looking out for special interests of a select few people and groups who were all victims of Western culture and not anyone else. The world has to pay for Western liberal guilt. They wanted to spread their DEI around the world trying to push only a very exclusively Western cultural faction of ideals onto everyone else. Everything else... the Democrats followed the Republicans' lead. And look how that basically torpedoed their chances of winning the Presidential election. What's Rahm Emanuel going to bring? Hoping the Jews go Democrat like they did with Trump? Yes ignore everyone else... again. That's why they lost the Muslim vote in Michigan. Their logic was what other choice do they have... Trump? And they did choose him. That same thing happened with most other major groups they chose to ignore.
Taking-A-Dump-101
If we applied the same standards to China no one can criticize the SeeSeePee because Nanjing Massacre. Otherwise it is anti-Sinoism.
The new chinese marriage law is extremely dumb if the goal is to boost birth rate. Make it extremely easy to get married and difficult to get divorced. Then how about welfare for women in abusive marraiges??? And why would women get married if divorce is so difficult??? Now they would think a lot harder before comitting, and rightly so.
"Hiroshima and Nagasaki nuke casualties are overstated by the Japanese government. The real death toll was actually 10X less than what they claim. They should stop with the exaggerations and get over it already."
edit: whoops my bad. misread the point you were trying to make. However, for the right-winged Japanese who question Nanjing, this one's for you.
Last edited:
It is like talking to children.
Now we cannot even swear.
The look on that old guy's face.
Enough! I am going to beat your ass! But child services will arrest me!
But they won't do that, they will in fact even criticise the "CCP" 100x while glazing the Japanese.
Because that "standard" only applies to white people or those who kneel and obey them. These people are inherently racist.
Much like the same logic of when a White person commits a crime, they say, "this white individual is a criminal."
When a Chinese person commits a crime, they say, "the chinese has a culture of cheating."
This is more relevant in the China demography thread.
manqiangrexue
Brigadier
What's the law? Can you post it? I have a feeling that the point is to stop people from getting divorced from heated arguments and give them further time to cool down and think. If they are truly incompatible, they will complete the difficult procedure because that is the rest of their lives.
This should be a police and criminal issue.
They marry for love and for trust. Typically, when one marries, s/he is over the moon with confidence in the potential spouse and with excitement for their new lives together. There is no doubt because in agreeing to the marriage, she strongly believes that the divorce statistic will forever be a number they read in the news and nothing more, so the thought of how easy it is to divorce is not a factor in consideration.
When my wife and I got married, the law could have been that you get beheaded if you get divorced and we would have signed the contract without a second thought.
Last edited: