Miscellaneous News

RedMetalSeadramon

RedMetalSeadramon

Junior Member
Registered Member
GulfLander said:
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1911124852905558038
Click to expand...

One racist white eurotrash, quoting and promoting another racist white eurotrash.

One works for SCMP, other for HKU, as expected.

If the Central Government doesn't proactively manage political rectification in Hong Kong, it will only be a matter of time before another NATO regime change operation comes to fruition.

No sympathies for when that happens
 
Lnk111229

Lnk111229

Junior Member
Registered Member
FriedButter said:
Lol. The White House deputy chief is demanding China capitulation.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1911518069253607648
Click to expand...
Ah, now i realise those US funding, building China shit talk is just another white supremacy spectrum. It similar when Brit or French points to some nice road, big building, railway in their former colony and say: See how nice those things, we build it and give to you and you should feel grateful. Just casually forgot to mention all those infrastructure, building is fund by local country wealth, by hand and blood and life of countless local slaves force labour. And for what, so those White empire is easier to extract and transport resources back to their empire. To easy control their colonies etc. Honestly those colonial is off the hook of it bloody history too easy.
 
T

tokenanalyst

Brigadier
Registered Member
FriedButter said:
Lol. The White House deputy chief is demanding China capitulation.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1911518069253607648
Click to expand...
So they want China to eat 64% of "US consumer taxes" without retaliation. 64% is basically the same as accepting 100%.

Well, Biden and their stooges make sure of reducing China dependency on the US, way more than Trump did in their first term. Their exports dependency to the US has basically stalled and declined to 12% of their total or less than 2% of GDP, compared to Vietnam with 30% of GDP, Mexico 30% of GDP and Canada 20% of GDP.
The stooges export controls forced China to develop their own semiconductor supply chain, the same is happening in many other areas like biotech. The antagonistic treatment of Chinese companies in the US means that most of them don't hold large market share in the US market. Different from US companies in China.
By having very low inflation and no using stimulus recklessly means that China has more ammunition in their monetary arsenal to weather a global recession, IF happens.

I won't say is going to be easy, but 64% of "US consumer taxes" is unacceptable for any country.
 
Bellum_Romanum

Bellum_Romanum

Brigadier
Registered Member
lych470 said:
Reposted from the China Economics Thread.


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

An essay from Kurt Campbell, deputy Secretary of State under the Biden Administration.

The essay disputes some of the points of the China decline crowd (demographics, nominal GDP ratio between US and China), and offers some strategies for the US to compete with China, namely, empowering allies in terms of security, capacity building, and a common regulatory and tariff regime.

Correct takes from the US perspective on this Grand Game.

I find it somewhat ironic that the steps Campbell offered is also quite congruent with the ending of US hegemony. I wonder if the irony is apparentn to the author.
Click to expand...
I am more incensed than ever reading the Liberals unrelenting pursuit of CHINA'S TOTAL ECONOMIC demise without any hint of irony to the level of delerium and deleterious aims it wants and yearns for China to do and accept.

Imagine the passage where Australia is given the supposed control and sheriff of the Pacific Islands, Vietnam as the sheriff of South East Asia, India to South Asia etc..virtually giving no quarters to China - despite its economic, trade, military, scale, and size in the world.

How would and should the Chinese people interpret such declared hostile ambitions if not through complete and contemptible resistance?

Should the Chinese people readily accept the imposition and assumptions about them. How is this situation any different from the 8 countries alliance that was employed against China during its nadir? What the west seek, lead by the U.S. can't be tolerated by any self-respecting country regardless of its political system or outlook, so why would these so-called strategist pursue an objective that allows the existing political system in China - that it seek to minimize and ultimately be replaced by a more pliant organization and leaders - to have it's population rally around and support wholesale thereby preventing the overall aims and objectives from being successful?
 
FairAndUnbiased

FairAndUnbiased

Brigadier
Registered Member
Bellum_Romanum said:
I am more incensed than ever reading the Liberals unrelenting pursuit of CHINA'S TOTAL ECONOMIC demise without any hint of irony to the level of delerium and deleterious aims it wants and yearns for China to do and accept.

Imagine the passage where Australia is given the supposed control and sheriff of the Pacific Islands, Vietnam as the sheriff of South East Asia, India to South Asia etc..virtually giving no quarters to China - despite its economic, trade, military, scale, and size in the world.

How would and should the Chinese people interpret such declared hostile ambitions if not through complete and contemptible resistance?

Should the Chinese people readily accept the imposition and assumptions about them. How is this situation any different from the 8 countries alliance that was employed against China during its nadir? What the west seek, lead by the U.S. can't be tolerated by any self-respecting country regardless of its political system or outlook, so why would these so-called strategist pursue an objective that allows the existing political system in China - that it seek to minimize and ultimately be replaced by a more pliant organization and leaders - to have it's population rally around and support wholesale thereby preventing the overall aims and objectives from being successful?
Click to expand...
They never account for the fact that the opponent can punch back.
 
proelite

proelite

Junior Member
lych470 said:
Reposted from the China Economics Thread.


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

An essay from Kurt Campbell, deputy Secretary of State under the Biden Administration.

The essay disputes some of the points of the China decline crowd (demographics, nominal GDP ratio between US and China), and offers some strategies for the US to compete with China, namely, empowering allies in terms of security, capacity building, and a common regulatory and tariff regime.

Correct takes from the US perspective on this Grand Game.

I find it somewhat ironic that the steps Campbell offered is also quite congruent with the ending of US hegemony. I wonder if the irony is apparentn to the author.
Click to expand...

A nation that can't organize itself effectively thinks the way to counter China is to organize something much bigger?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top