Miscellaneous News

supercat

Colonel
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
I guess the Trump regime needs TikTok for the mid-term elections.

According to Godfather's mafia tactic, all the US regime has to do next is to eliminate Ali Khamenei.

Here is the English version.
While I don't think that the willingness to fight for your country depends on the number of your siblings, with Taiwan's low birth rate, a vast number of its fighting force is probably single sons.

Good - industrial policies out, Maoism in:

LMAO tweet of the day - confusing Japan with China:

Coping article of the day:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
pb6ddvb.gif
 

Overbom

Brigadier
Registered Member
At this historic moment of America's ongoing implosion, I felt my memories resurfacing some past events.

One I find noteworthy, is revisiting Tiger Yang's speech at Anchorage dismantling US in front of Blinking and Sullivan's funny faces

Enjoy and witness their clown show of "position of strength"
YANG: (Via interpreter) Well, it was my bad. When I entered this room, I should have reminded the U.S. side of paying attention to its tone in our respective opening remarks, but I didn't.

The Chinese side felt compelled to make this speech because of the tone of the U.S. side.
Well, isn't this the intention of the United States -- judging from what, or the way that you have made your opening remarks -- that it wants to speak to China in a condescending way from a position of strength?
So was this carefully all planned and was it carefully orchestrated with all the preparations in place? Is that the way that you had hoped to conduct this dialogue?
Well, I think we thought too well of the United States. We thought that the U.S. side will follow the necessary diplomatic protocols. So for China it was necessary that we made our position clear.
Dropping bombs left and right
So let me say here that, in front of the Chinese side, the United States does not have the qualification to say that it wants to speak to China from a position of strength.
The U.S. side was not even qualified to say such things even 20 years or 30 years back, because this is not the way to deal with the Chinese people. If the United States wants to deal properly with the Chinese side, then let's follow the necessary protocols and do things the right way.
"Well, I think we thought too well of the United States. We thought that the U.S. side will follow the necessary diplomatic protocols"


Should had heed the warning Americans, have fun now.
Well, as long as China's system is right with the wisdom of the Chinese people, there is no way to strangle China. Our history will show that one can only cause damages to himself if he wants to strangle or suppress the Chinese people.

Tiger Yang has dutifully served China for so long. I hope he is happy watching his efforts pay off


You can read the entire transcript here
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

4Runner

Senior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

If true, that would be significant. I has been a paid user for GitHub/CoPilot, which was acquired by MSFT and now is called Microsoft/Azure CoPilot. But tied by OpenAI, it allowed stuff like Cursor AI to have a viable business, which is essentially an open source VSCode with list of AI options including DeepSeek-R1/V3 and Grok3.

If this tweet becomes true, it would kill business models like Cursor AI, in which I mostly use with DeepSeek-R1/V3 anyway.

In general and in long run, third-party integrators such as Perplexity AI and Cursor AI are not going to do well as first-party integration develops and evolves.
 

FriedButter

Brigadier
Registered Member
US is going ahead with enforcing a modern Napoleon Continental System on China.

China must impose the exact same retaliation. All shipping companies that own or operate US, SK, JP, etc ships should face the exact same penalties.

Exclusive: US to levy fees on China-linked ships, push allies to do likewise or face US retaliation, draft executive order says​

LONDON, March 6 (Reuters) - The United States is planning to charge fees for docking at U.S. ports on any ship that is part of a fleet that includes Chinese-built or Chinese-flagged vessels and will push allies to act similarly or face retaliation, a draft executive order stated.

The administration of U.S. President Donald Trump is drafting the executive order in a bid to resuscitate domestic shipbuilding and weaken China's grip on the global shipping industry.

Addressing China's growing dominance of the seas and diminishing U.S. naval readiness is a rare point of consensus between U.S. Republican and Democratic lawmakers.

Chinese shipbuilders account for more than 50% of all merchant vessel cargo capacity produced globally each year, up from just 5% in 1999, according to the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

That gain came at the expense of shipbuilders in Japan and South Korea. U.S. shipbuilding peaked in the 1970s and now accounts for a sliver of the industry output.

The draft executive order, dated February 27 and reviewed by Reuters on Thursday, proposes fees should be imposed on any vessel that enters a U.S. port, "regardless of where it was built or flagged, if that vessel is part of a fleet that includes vessels built or flagged in the PRC (People's Republic of China)."

The U.S. administration and Chinese officials could not be immediately reached for comment.

The document draws from a U.S. Trade Representative's office proposal last month to levy fees of up to $1.5 million on Chinese-built vessels entering U.S. ports after a probe into China's growing domination of global shipbuilding, maritime and logistics sectors.

A key difference is that the draft executive order does not include USTR language stating that port fees on fleets would be imposed when Chinese-built ships account for 25% or more of vessels operating, slated for delivery or on order.

It also did not put a dollar value on those fees or say how they would be calculated.

The plan could inflict significant costs on major container carriers including China's COSCO, Switzerland's MSC, Denmark's Maersk (MAERSKb.CO)and Taiwan's Evergreen Marine (2603.TW) as well as on operators of ships that carry bulk food, fuel and autos.

MSC CEO Soren Toft said earlier this week the world's largest container carrier could visit fewer U.S. ports to limit its exposure to the new fees.

The draft executive order also calls on U.S. officials to engage allies and partners to enact similar measures or risk retaliation.

The U.S. would also impose tariffs on Chinese cargo-handling equipment, according to the draft order.

"The national security and economic prosperity of the United States is further endangered by the People's Republic of China's unfair trade practices in the maritime, logistics, and shipbuilding sectors," the draft order said.

Reuters had reported on Wednesday on plans to impose fees on imports arriving on Chinese-made ships from a draft fact sheet of the 18-point executive order.

French carrier CMA CGM said on Thursday it would spend the next four years expanding its U.S.-flagged American President Lines fleet to 30 from 10 currently.

CMA CGM is the world's third-largest container shipping line and is part of a vessel-sharing alliance with companies

including COSCO. It counts global retailer Walmart (WMT.N) as a top customer and last week said the proposed U.S. port fees on China-built ships would affect all shipping firms.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

zyklon

Junior Member
Registered Member
The primary issue at play here isn't Taiwan's low birth rate, it's the absence of a coherent and healthy national identity that actual countries tend to possess.

You see, Taiwan isn't an actual country, like say North Korea or Vietnam.

Naturally, its residents generally speaking lack a desire to defend it as such.

While I don't think that the willingness to fight for your country depends on the number of your siblings, with Taiwan's low birth rate, a vast number of its fighting force is probably single sons.
 

zyklon

Junior Member
Registered Member
Fairly sure the FBI's National Security Branch has China's embassy in DC, as well as its consulates in New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco and Chicago, under around the clock surveillance, assuming they aren't getting hit hard by personnel cuts themselves.

So any laid off federal employee or contractor, who is worth their salt, isn't going to be dumb enough to walk into a Chinese, Russian or whatever diplomatic mission within the US.

However, that's not going to stop them from selling American secrets if that's what they really want to do.

In fact, won't be surprised if some of them end up getting recruited on LinkedIn after updating their profiles upon receiving official termination notices.

 
Top