Miscellaneous News

Ringsword

Senior Member
Registered Member
Even Hollywood isn’t delusional enough to think that will ever work out well. I am honestly struggling to think of a single move or show where that worked out well for America.
Don't forget that many of the cartel's soldiers are/were Mexican army and even special forces trained for many years with the US special forces therefore knowing their ways/methods intimately-capturing/killing several US SF's would be a national public disaster-Trump/rubio will have to earn their paycheck that week!!
 

Chevalier

Major
Registered Member
And she's even one year younger than me, i wonder who's dingdong she has to licked to get this job.
An old fart pushing 60 and get she still needs to work
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
I was watching the latest episode of Real Time With Bill Maher. Throughout the show it was filled with veiled attacks on China whatever the subject to where it didn't make sense. Max Brooks, son of Mel Brooks, was a guest. He wrote the book World War Z. He somehow blamed China for the air collision over Washington claiming China will force Trump to privatize the FAA by donating to Trump's cryptocurrency. Then China can insert their computer chips into US aircraft so that when China invades Taiwan, Xi Jinping will threaten Trump for the US to not get involved or else he'll make all US aircraft fall from the sky and Trump will comply. The other guest was British author Dan Jones. He said that Europeans walked three thousand miles to Beijing representing the Pope to ask China for... help? He didn't specify what did the master race wanted help for. Then he said the Chinese crumbled the piece of paper pleading for help and the Chinese demanded the Pope to come to China and bow down to the Chinese emperor. They also talked about the rise of the right-wing in Europe being blamed on migrants. And why is Europe so sensitive about immigration? Because they have a history of being invaded with emphasis on the Huns, who Maher said were from China, and the Mongols. They also talked about DEI to which they said was necessary because minorities in the US were being disenfranchised but they blamed it on China for taking away jobs from Americans. Max Brooks pointed out when Elon Musk was brought up how he doesn't criticize China.

Interesting thing was it was like the were trying to insert China into everything they were talking about. They started off talking about division in the US and then Maher oddly segued into talking about "DeepSucks". And Maher tried to make it sound like it wasn't intentional. That's the reason why all the China bashing on the show. Two Jews and a British guy who see the old world that they influenced crumbling before their eyes. Sam Altman and Mark Zuckerberg the captains of global AI ready to take over the world foiled by a Chinese upstart. TikTok the last refuge where people can freely talk about the genocide in Gaza... How much money are they going to lose because the usual suspects are losing control of the narrative of the world. I wonder how many less Jews didn't go to a Chinese restaurant last Christmas. All they do is perpetuate their own stereotypes. And remember this fact... The Germans may have been the Nazis to Europe but the British were longer the Nazis to the rest of the world.
It’s apparent that based on the obsession over nazi films and nazism, that the Jews long to become the nazis who persecuted them the way Indians desire to be the british Colonisers. In this, they reveal their moral debauchery and weakness of character. Such cultures should have never developed past north sentinel island level of technology but here we are.

Why The China Bubble Still Hasn’t Popped
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Bloomberg acknowledges the Chinese economic transition.

FT and Bloomberg successfully redpilled.

The Economist, NYT, and WSJ left.
Ft and Bloomberg need to make money off the Stockmarket, the remainder are just make work jobs programs for the fail children of the Anglo elite.


prepare for another bloodbath tomorrow on Wall Street, gents. Hope your short positions are still open.
 

pmc

Colonel
Registered Member
we have to see how Trump approach this Europe. Europe is the place where Trump and Arabs interest converge and they know how things should be done and i dont think in human history any one else have made this much wealth. . Even this Indians money ends up in UAE.
The more Indian rupee/stock devalues the higher Gold and real estate investment in Gulf countries. who knows behind the scene Trump kicking India on Arab advice. This real estate ties a person to that infrastructure and laws.
Serbia is small side show.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

tygyg1111

Major
Registered Member
China won’t actively go after India, because India is beneath China’s contempt, literally, as China doesn’t care enough about India to be annoyed by them. Just like you wouldn’t even think to wonder if the cockroaches in the sewer loves or loathes you, and if they actually hate your guts, so what? The overwhelming majority of Chinese people in China simply don’t think about India at all.

China’s leaders are also not stupid and know that sooner or later India won’t be able to help itself but to attack China. Probably in the most underhanded way and time possible, jumping in unprovoked to try to stab China in the back as it is busy fighting the Anglos in the East. That is why China is fully prepared for the inevitable backstab, and will take that hit and then counter attack and shatter India.

Shattering a country is a big, nasty and messy undertaking. Lots of ordinary Chinese people will be rightly upset if Beijing just annihilated India for no apparent reason out of the blue. But if India attacked China unprovoked first, then very few people in China will be as upset.
An Indian strike on China when China is fighting the anglos would be intended as a crippling strike, such that the Indian action allows the anglos to win.
This would be a cynically risky scenario to allow because we lose our own whilst also being direct combatants.
China would have made preparations well in advance to deter and prevent this kind of action, as there is no upper limit on what could and would be selected as a target. Civilian infrastructure would be a given, if in the Indian mind, it gives them a chance to end the war and become the "2" in the new G2.
Destroying India violently also offers no real benefit to China - the market is destroyed, and the humanitarian crisis could be used by malicious third parties against China. It's not like we need the land either.
In times of war I would expect Indian propaganda to solidify national unity, so avenues for a targeted attack that rekindles political / religious / ethnic fault lines will be limited and harder to exploit. The environment also may not be permissible for intelligence 'pre-work' to enable such avenues.

On the other hand, if the Indian attack is pathetically weak, it would then be hard for China to justify a crippling strike in India, so again, we incur damage for little gain.

There is a non-zero chance that the contest between the US and China transpires without any hot war or direct regional action; this is the angle China is prioritizing.
Once the balance of power is lopsided enough, I would expect the Indians flip to China, cowering and begging and calling "Saar", after which internal influence + Pakistan + Bangladesh can be used to slowly return India to individual religious and ethnic blocs.
The plotting and scheming will still be there but much weaker, however can be used as a blackmail tool.
This way the market survives intact, the combatants are proxies, the action occurs entirely on the 'away field', and China still has plausible deniability. Clean sheet all round.
 
Top