Here is the non-paywall version of the article:
Had DeepSeek relied on stolen data from OpenAI, OpenAl would have had 30 versions of DeepSeek by now. It would be poetic justice if OpenAI starts to look for a mole of Chinese ethnicity in its team.
As though OpenAI doesn't have built-in tools for censorship, such as "ethical safeguards".
Here is the whole team:
How much news about China from Western MSM is true? 17%?
New York Times is coping hard: DeepSeek is a success, therefore, meta is a success!
no, every 12 years-the Kumbh Mela is a giant hindu festival at the confluence of the Ganges-imagine 100 million hindus pooping/preeing/drinking/bathing in said river-always a shitshow in deaths.
Love them!!!Absolute national treasures-An upcoming luncheon or dinner with the BigBoss to honour these wonderful cybersoldiers is in order-also some protection MSS!!!
I was reading someone's thread on X where he was doing a deep dive into why DeekSeek R1 went viral and I think he had a good point. Besides the technical merits of the model he noticed (and I concur) that there is significant amount of schadenfreude in seeing OpenAI get what's coming. If you just do a search on DeepSeek on youtube you can see all the videos taking that schadenfreude tone talking about how it dropped a bomb on the sharemarket and is smashing the AI bro oligarch. The guy's theory is there is nascent class conscious emerging in the US which understand the big tech oligarchs are in alignment with the government (demonstrated all the more clearly during Trump's inauguration and Stargate) intent on creating a techno-feudal society straight out of Cyberpunk 2077. DeepSeek due to its open source nature just happens to fit the Robin Hood image well, hence why ordinary people identify with it much more than the big AIs. The fact that this narrative slots right in with the "oligarch intend to replace us with H1B Indians" and XHS refugees thinking China is a socialist worker utopia are also extra bonus.
