Miscellaneous News

jiajia99

Junior Member
Registered Member
The US government was afraid of potential backdoor penetrations XD
Haven’t they been doing that for the last century to anyone that cannot say no. Now they are in danger of the very same thing happening to them and given past break ins, this is bound to hurt, they complain like chickens, well in this situation, all I can say is, ‘have a happy break in, I hope you lose your ill gotten assets and may you hopefully learn to respect your neighbours more’ but we all know they won’t do that, honest
 

FriedButter

Major
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Harris’s Support for Gaza Cease-Fire Hints at Foreign-Policy Shift - …​

July 22, 2024 11:00 pm ET
WASHINGTON—As the administration’s most ardent senior-level advocate of securing a cease-fire in Gaza, Vice President Kamala Harris’s elevation to the Democratic Party’s standard-bearer now puts her in a stronger position to advocate for a shift in U.S. policy toward Israel and to carry out those changes should she win in November.

Though Harris has been careful not to contradict Biden, she has often pushed the envelope of the administration’s messaging on the Israel-Gaza conflict. She has at times advocated forcefully, and ahead of other administration officials, for limiting civilian casualties and addressing the humanitarian crisis in the enclave.

I think she will be more inclined to find other ways to put pressure on Israel if the situation in Gaza does not dramatically improve,” said Ivo Daalder, who served as NATO ambassador during the Obama administration and is well connected with Biden aides.

Harris’s Middle East views will be in the spotlight this week when she and Biden meet with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The plan is for Harris to have her own separate meeting with the Israeli leader, according to an aide to Harris. She won’t be in Washington for his high-stakes speech to Congress because she will be traveling to Indianapolis for a previously scheduled event.

During the meeting, Harris is expected to tell Netanyahu that “it is time for the war to end in a way where Israel is secure, all hostages are released, the suffering of Palestinian civilians in Gaza ends, and the Palestinian people can enjoy their right to dignity, freedom, and self-determination,” the aide said.

Harris is likely to focus on securing the nomination this week and will want to steer clear of any confrontation with Netanyahu, analysts said, not least so as to avoid opening herself up to any criticism that she is weak on Israel.
Harris’s relationship with Netanyahu will be very different than that of Biden, who has sparred with the Israeli prime minister but also has decades of experience in dealing with him, a U.S. official said.

She won’t be starting from scratch. Harris has been on almost every call between Biden and Netanyahu, for a total of more than 20, according to the White House official.

She also has a longstanding relationship with Israeli President Isaac Herzog, the official said. The two have had five phone conversations since Oct. 7 and met once in person at the Munich Security Conference, the official said.

Her husband, Doug Emhoff, is the first Jewish spouse of a U.S. president or vice president and has been outspoken on the issue of antisemitism particularly since the Oct. 7 attacks.

A Harris presidency could lead to a shake-up of the Democratic national security team, with Philip Gordon, her national security adviser, likely to play a central role. Gordon served as the top State Department official for Europe in the Obama administration and later worked as a senior White House official on Middle East issues, where he was deeply skeptical of plans to arm Syrian opponents of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

Key Biden appointees, including national security adviser Jake Sullivan, Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin wouldn’t likely be extended in their current roles, current and former officials say.

Over several decades, the Democratic foreign policy establishment has been divided between those seeking a more assertive role for the U.S. abroad, and others more skeptical of military force. The Clinton administration dubbed the U.S. an “indispensable nation” and undertook selective military interventions to quell ethnic strife in the Balkans, while the Obama administration was more cautious about the use of force and balked at providing lethal military assistance to Ukraine.


As vice president, Harris hasn’t had an opportunity to define her own brand of foreign policy, though some observers say she might ultimately align herself more closely with the progressive elements of the Democratic Party and might be more inclined to make U.S. support for Israel more conditional on its conduct in Gaza and the West Bank.

Harris drew attention during a March speech in Selma, Ala., when she assailed what she described as inhumane conditions in the enclave, and urged Israel to do more to expedite aid to Gaza. She talked in graphic terms about how Palestinians in Gaza were eating animal feed and leaves to stay alive.

“Our common humanity compels us to act,” she said.

Jim Zogby, the founder of the Arab American Institute, who has criticized Biden’s response to the war, said he spoke with Harris by phone in October and believed she has demonstrated “far greater empathy” for Palestinians than Biden and other White House aides.

Early on during the war, Harris’s advisers were concerned about “Biden’s Bibi bear hug,” said Steven Cook of the Council on Foreign Relations, arguing that it wasn’t buying them important influence.

“She is a moderate, but I think the earlier and more vocal criticism of [Netanyahu] was her nod to progressives,” Cook added.
Key Biden appointees, including national security adviser Jake Sullivan, Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin wouldn’t likely be extended in their current roles, current and former officials say.

Wont be long before the rest of the Biden group is purged.
 

ficker22

Senior Member
Registered Member
German state news is unbearable, NS Wochenschau feeling.

Shilling for German Indopacific involement (Protecting our trade routes from our biggets trade partner kind of style)

Connoting Noodles with italians, all the while the Chinese ate noodles already while germanic tribes vandalized rome.

Buying Expensive Boogey US Junk (F-35) instead of just using/developing home grown solutions.

Post Zenith westoid-stan.
 

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
Gently now. You and I both know that Confucius was restricting music of the courts, not the musical enjoyment of the commons. With respect to the artistic environment of Tang, the rites of Zhou had long since passed. In fact, it is a demonstration of the shift (which started a good long time before Tang) away from the strict demands of ritual expression.
" 八佾舞于庭,是可忍也,孰不可忍也 " While not directly with regards to music, does show a degree of, shall we call it, restriction in the expression of the arts. You may say that this is a ceremonial work, and so restriction is with merit, but the Western churches stifled artistic expression by reason of ceremony for many hundreds of years and we still must call that a restriction.
Seriously, you just demonstrated how poor your knowledge of classic Chinese is, and how fake you are in "knowing" Chinese and her history.

The circumstance of your quotation is that dancing formation of 64 (8 * 8) is a privilege of the King, the person who Confucius got angry with was a minister who is only allowed to have a formation of 32. Confucius objected the breaking of the rule not art itself. If a vilige party had 500 hundreds people dancing, Confucius wouldn't care. It is like nobody but the King/Queen in the UK is allowed to dress up in the royal regalia, does it mean the UK is (a degree of) restrictive in fashion? Or a U.S. civilian dressing as a Police officer and walk around the street, does it mean US is (a degree of) restrictive to fashion?

Next time if you want to pretend knowing something, read the full texts, get the contexts and learn deeper of what is being the matter. The rest of your post doesn't deserve rebutal considering you lack of basic knowledge.
 
Last edited:

valysre

Junior Member
Registered Member
German state news is unbearable, NS Wochenschau feeling.

Shilling for German Indopacific involement (Protecting our trade routes from our biggets trade partner kind of style)

Connoting Noodles with italians, all the while the Chinese ate noodles already while germanic tribes vandalized rome.

Buying Expensive Boogey US Junk (F-35) instead of just using/developing home grown solutions.

Post Zenith westoid-stan.
Ah, you can hardly blame the Germans for a lot of things. They are, after all, host to some tens of thousands of US soldiers.
What? An occupation? No, no, no! It's a friendly security force here to ensure stability for our democratic partners in Europe!
 

valysre

Junior Member
Registered Member
The circumstance of your quotation is that dancing formation of 64 (8 * 8) is a privilege of the King, the person who Confucius got angry with was a minister who is only allowed to have a formation of 32. It is a ritual rule and Confucius object the breaking of the rule not art itself.
I fear you did not read the next sentence in my post:
"You may say that this is a ceremonial work, and so restriction is with merit, ..."
I am in fact aware of the context of the quotation.
It is like nobody but the King/Queen in the UK is allowed to dress up in the royal regalia, does it mean the UK is restrictive in fashion?
My position on this is: yes. It's a restriction on creative expression. It may be a bad thing, it may not be, but it is a restriction. But I have not said that all creativity is good, or that all expression should be welcomed.
Next time if you want to pretend knowing something, read the full texts, get the contexts and learn deeper of what is being the matter. The rest of your post doesn't deserve rebutal considering you lack of basic knowledge.
Yes, and you please read the entire paragraph before jumping out.
 

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
I fear you did not read the next sentence in my post:
"You may say that this is a ceremonial work, and so restriction is with merit, ..."
I am in fact aware of the context of the quotation.

My position on this is: yes. It's a restriction on creative expression. It may be a bad thing, it may not be, but it is a restriction. But I have not said that all creativity is good, or that all expression should be welcomed.

Yes, and you please read the entire paragraph before jumping out.
I see that the bold texts is your point? So your post was to present a wellknown fact that exists everywhere and all the time? That is very valuable insight.:cool:
 

valysre

Junior Member
Registered Member
I see that the bold texts is your point? So your post was to present a wellknown fact that exists everywhere and all the time? That is very valuable insight.:cool:
It is indeed a valuable insight, when there are people claiming that only America has creativity, and that all this creativity is a wonderful superpower. Or that China has no creativity, and that will be China's downfall.
Well known or not, those who know can ignore, and those who do not know can learn. It is surprising how many people think creativity will be the end all be all of this second Cold War.
 
Top