Dumb comment. US has an extensive history of interfering in South American countries affairs.
So the Russian election interference in the 2016 election was very effective and true as well? Lol come on man. The fact is, elections and democracy don't always provide the best solution in selecting leader(s) of any given country, least of all a basket case that's Argentina.
They tried the military dictatorship and they ended up losing badly when the said idiots went to war against the U.K. for the battle of Falkland Island ownership. Then, as their reward for extreme hubris and military incompetence, they were handed down leaders after leaders that were as corrupt as the one that got replaced; it didn't matter if the person was a leftist or rightist, they all kiss the same ring of corruption.
The people in Argentina, I would posit are simply tired of electing leaders that talk a good game, had sterling educational background etc. which have not delivered them anything substantial thar made their economic lives better. The one that just got elected maybe crazy to most of us outsiders, but he speaks the language and frustrations they feel that the newly elected president embodies.
If that clown further the country's demise then at least, they have no one else to blame but themselves and civil war for them ensues. Countries that want to play stupid games must win stupid prizes and let them suffer the consequences without any interference from a country like China. Let the Americans bear the costs of stabilizing a deadbeat country along with all the Latin American countries that want to ape Argentinas way.