Miscellaneous News

emblem21

Major
Registered Member
hk_2010wangcvr.jpg
They are still parroting the loser? Oh well, the Times is like Netflix, overrated bullshit that looks good on cover, but the content itself serves up pure vomit, kinda like the general population of the USA that is currently shitting on the street right now after being kicked out of the homes having to use to have after being forced to use their tax dollars in part to fund trash like Joshua who is ultimately going to be in jail for the rest of his sorry life
 

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
LMFAO

Apparently someone in the Mandarin section of Radio Free Asia has lost his shit because Xi wasn't couped.


Yu Jie (this Hanjian fella) ...
View attachment 98897
... decides to write an RFA article, which can be concluded as him having his autistic and hysterical meltdown about how Xi still receives broad support from the Chinese people.

Translating his Tweet as saying:


Thank God that people like him got rid of themselves from China and the Chinese people.

We hate the CCP and not the Chinese people...

Oh and also.

 

LawLeadsToPeace

Senior Member
Staff member
Moderator - World Affairs
Registered Member
My reply to you was, again, in the context of the Saudi minister's ability to dress-down the journalist via his proficient command of the English language, which you presumably wished China would have such ability in their own dealings with foreign journos -
Ah. That’s the crux of this issue we have. You misunderstood my comment, which, from hindsight, wasn’t specific. What I advocated for was that the Chinese should completely shut down the reporters if they are willing to lie and slander. The Chinese are too passive and unwilling to say no to a reporter. They constantly answer in a very polite and tedious manner as if they are forced to at gunpoint, but they aren’t. For example, Western reporters constantly pushed the Xinjiang lie, and they still can ask the Chinese foreign spokespeople and representatives questions. The Chinese should have just told them to shut their mouths until they apologize for spreading such a lie just like the Saudis did.
 

horse

Colonel
Registered Member
I even talked to a professor about this way back in a simpler time. He was from Germany. I asked him what was different about US vs German schools. He said, "in Germany, we expected students to be at a certain level. When I came to the US I expected a similar level from my students, and it was a disaster. I have since readjusted my expectations. I am still adjusting them."

That is how they are going to take on China.

The United States only hope is too import more Chinese.

Importing more whites from Europe, and more Asians, and more of everyone else, won't be enough.

Historically China was a magnet for others. The brain drain will definitely be a two way street.

The Americans how they think about it, got it all wrong again.

:oops:
 

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
That is how they are going to take on China.

The United States only hope is too import more Chinese.

Importing more whites from Europe, and more Asians, and more of everyone else, won't be enough.

Historically China was a magnet for others. The brain drain will definitely be a two way street.

The Americans how they think about it, got it all wrong again.

:oops:

The problem is that they need more Qian Xueshengs and Yang Zhennings but are actually getting more Nate Laws and Yu Jies.
 

Overbom

Brigadier
Registered Member
Sobering article by Hu on the recent Ukraine-Russia war developments and its wider implications for China and the whole world
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
I have seen some analysis internationally, including on the Chinese Internet: Putin's partial mobilization order was unsuccessful, the failure of the Russian army in the Ukrainian battlefield is irreversible, and a new "revolution" may occur in Russia. There is another analysis to the contrary, that Putin is taking control of the bureau calmly, and believes that he will eventually use nuclear weapons to quell the entire opponent. The latter analysis also believes that Biden has no countermeasures against Putin's use of nuclear weapons.
It must be seen that the tension and danger of the situation are unprecedented, and the strategic depth touched by the great uncertainty is unprecedented. What's really bad is that the original geopolitical pattern and its basic stability have been broken, the lack of inclusiveness and room for maneuver is quickly lost, the zero-sum nature and the determination to kill the other side are rapidly fermenting, the logic of struggle It became chaotic, unexpected, and very decisive. Nuclear weapons used to be the ballast that calmed everyone down, but what it is now is hard to say.
The overall environment for safeguarding China's peaceful development is likely to experience the most severe situation since the reform and opening up. China needs strength and will, and at the same time, it must be sober and show wisdom. Not only do we have to stay out of this potentially bottomless conflict, but we also have to work hard to keep the overall damage to China from this war and the big showdown relatively minimal. The United States really wants to be the super trader of the whole situation. It will be willing to put the Taiwan Strait issue, China-Europe relations, etc. into one big basket. What we have to do is never become part of the American trader, and always maintain our own strategic independence and integrity. sex.
Many comments on the Russian-Ukrainian conflict on the Chinese Internet are bipolar, some angrily accuse Russia of supporting Ukraine, and many voices are diametrically opposed. They have different values and attitudes, and it is their right to express one's mind directly. However, how to safeguard China's national interests in the current storm is not an easy task. Not only do we have to support what the Chinese professional diplomatic team has done for this country, but we also pay tribute to the steadiness they have shown.
 
Top