Miscellaneous News

G

gelgoog

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
Crang said:
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1499459262627876865
Click to expand...
Oh dear. Poor Moldova. Just one short hop from Odessa once that gets taken out. You know what. I don't think it was in Russia's plan to annex Novorossyia but these jokers might just make that an inevitability. Simply expanding the Russian Federation's borders towards those countries would greatly simplify the Russian Federation's defensive position. If the EU accepts all these countries which have internal conflict situations, Moldova with Transnistria, Georgia with Abkhazia and Ossetia, they must be out of their rocker.

You know what. Turkey is right. They should accept them too. The EU's excuse has always been the Kurdish situation and the fact they are in Asia. But if they accept Georgia. Then why not Turkey?

Erdogan in EU 2022.
 
Last edited:
Bellum_Romanum

Bellum_Romanum

Brigadier
Registered Member
FriedButter said:
Article is straight forward with no added opinion but idk how good the reputation of SupChina is as an unbiased source of news for other articles and topics.



Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Click to expand...
I didn't bother replying or responding to @Phead128 because the moment he linked his rebuttal using an article from (supchina) I declined from reading it because I was already aware of supchina's modus operandi, which is anti-China, but done in a very subtle way that wouldn't be too obvious for the average Joe's, and Jane's.
 
Phead128

Phead128

Captain
Staff member
Moderator - World Affairs
Bellum_Romanum said:
I didn't bother replying or responding to @Phead128 because the moment he linked his rebuttal using an article from (supchina) I declined from reading it because I was already aware of supchina's modus operandi, which is anti-China, but done in a very subtle way that wouldn't be too obvious for the average Joe's, and Jane's.
Click to expand...
Good thing all UNGA resolutions are public record and verifiable. That specific article is pretty based. It refered to failed attempt as the " “the greatest defeat for the United States in the history of the United Nations.”", doesn't seem very anti-China to me. It is overall a very historically accurate article, I challenge you to find a historically biased aspect from the article.
 
Last edited:
horse

horse

Colonel
Registered Member
horse said:
That article was going off the deep end.

This is an European war.

They failed to keep the peace. In Europe.

Somehow, China is caught up in all of that.
Click to expand...

I think it is a gigantic mistake for the west to bring China into this European mess.

China will back Russia all the way.

Full stop. There is no debate.

Now, the question is, do the west want China to back Russia all the back, and start degrading its relationship with the west too, for a lose-lose situation, that is up to the west to decide.

Two outcomes.

---> China backs Russia all the way. China and the west lose-lose.
---> China backs Russia all the way. China and the west win-win.

There is no China win, Russia, lose, west wins, outcome here.

With the China backs Russia all the way. China and the west lose-lose, outcome, China still has RCEP, the biggest trading area in the world, and fastest growing area of any big importance in the world, also the BRI running through basically everywhere.

China would like to continue its current relationship with Europe, but it already has their backup plans in place, and thriving basically, if EU-China relations derail.

What is the EU backup plan?

Who knows.

:oops::D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top