...Machado Says Venezuela Opposition Ready to Assume Power
....Venezuela seeks UN Security Council meeting on US bombings, foreign ministry says
Some reactions
Last edited:
...Machado Says Venezuela Opposition Ready to Assume Power
....Venezuela seeks UN Security Council meeting on US bombings, foreign ministry says
Yeah, but those things always exists everywhere to a major or lesser degree and things are bound to fail when one faction gets open support and the other just gets speeches and legalese instead of support as well, so you end with the obvious result.If you have corruption and infighting, you have opened the doors to external threats. It's an age old concept that has been exploited, rinsed and repeated endlessly.
The analogy falls by virtue of the difference in geopolitical dynamics, what requires to mount a workable defense nowadays against the US and back then.Again, you missed the point. The caliph was fed gold to remind him that had he used the gold to prepare his defense, instead of hoarding it, he wouldn't be in this position. Counter example is the Turk Mamluks of Egypt who annihilated the advancing Mongols. Or a more modern example: North Korea? Put all their money on nukes and missiles - now nobody in the West wants to interfere.
They share the societal control aspect(Burkhas, women are subhuman, etc.) and one inspired the other in this regardDeobandi is a Hanafi movement. Wahhabi is a Hanbali movement. These are distant ideologies.
Frankenstein didn't make Deobandi.
Anyways, blaming achieves nothing. It's a moot behavior. Nobody denies Western imperialism.
My door lock broke so I left it broken. My home got robbed. Now I can do one of two things: 1) fix the lock, or 2) leave the lock broken and blame the thief.
I mean, if money runs out and western society and politics collapse to the point overt antisemites sneak on, the Zionists don't have a choice.I don’t believe that is possible since Zionists pretty much own major institutions in those said countries that fund Israel. Banking and finance in the West is virtually a Zionist invention. It doesn't stop there - lot of big tech and media is also Zionist, specifically Jewish Zionist.
Even if any government ceased aiding Israel out of government funds, I'm certain these other Jewish-owned enterprises would be happy to fill the void (of which I bet they already are major financiers under the table; Balfour Declaration by Britain was written to a Jewish Banking family who has never resided in Israel).
Trying to extrapolate Panama, which is a US creation formed basically the same way Hong Kong as a separate entity did("gives us the land and or we will fuck you up") with the rest of Latin America is silly.It's not a surprise why most Latin countries remain stuck in the endless cycle of poverty, crime, prostitution, and corruption because they are truly incapable (not all) of exercising COMMON SENSE!
Agreed with a strong caveat:Well, it can only get better for Venezuela. The fact that millions of Venezuelans fled to Columbia out of all countries tells you all you need to know about the standard of living under Maduro's dictatorship. I think most Venezuelans would happily become US puppet in exchange for living standards improvement.
DOUBTFUL!!That is something they will never get, once a war starts, such a thing simply will not happen. Look at Afghanistan, things only got better when the USA was made to GTFO of that nation, does that mean when the USA finally goes the way of the Roman Empire (as in collapsing for real) that the world can finally catch a breather
Yes, US did South Korea a favor, but honestly I don't think a united DPRK would've done too much worse. It would've been a natural Chinese ally and most of all, Taiwan would not be tenable with a hostile Korean peninsula since it can cut Japan off from Okinawa.Damn. It costs that much huh? No wonder China has to choose very carefully. Just one or two bad investments can eat up a country's resources very easily. Even the US with its money printing is a lot more cautious now which is why they only changed Venezuela's leader instead of trying to change the whole country.
Compared to the US or even Russia (they backed Vietnam even after the Vietnam War ended), I still think China's investment in Vietnam went ok in the end. They do a lot of trade now and Vietnam doesn't actively try to piss off or oppose China. Its influence easily dwarfs US or Russia in Vietnam.
I think that the US only real successful rags to riches investment is in Korea. Everyone else was either on easy difficulty or just failed.
America is already becoming Latinized. Hispanics are already the majority in Cali and Texas, Catholicism is on the rise with Gen Z men and even its biggest far right White Nationalist is half Mexican and Catholic. With the ever growing immigration from South and Central Americans, 2nd generation Latinos growing prominence and the trend of Whites becoming a minority by 2025 is becoming ever more clear to see. The US either has to lean more to the Americas or try to buy time with “temp” H1Bs from India lol. I think more Americans prefer the former over the latter.China's investment in North Korea worked quite well. Failed in Vietnam but also made sure everyone else failed and now Vietnam government makes a pilgrimage to Beijing every time they change leadership.
Let's also look at Syria.
How much did the US spend? $1 billion annually.
Russia spent $700 million per campaign in comparison.
Investing in culturally similar countries is a winning strategy. US success in South Korea and Japan was only possible due to the post-WW2 moment. If they didn't intervene in the Korean War, there would only be DPRK and Japan wouldn't have made more blood money off of Koreans, making Japan into a poorer frontline state that would've still had significant socialist influence and instability.