Miscellaneous News

JJD1803

Junior Member
Registered Member
Era of small FPV drones means that guerilla and resistance forces have gotten a huge power boost. Dont even need to train skilled drone operators, just let loose AI drone swarms supplied by your friendly AliExpress distributor

I am sure there would be nothing better than cheap Chinese drones getting smuggler to Venezuelan resistance in the jungle and then Venezuela doing hit and run attacks with hundreds of them in a single raid.

If China decided to help Venezuela, and locals have the heart and courage to resist, then Venezuela would become a huge graveyard for US
China doesn’t really have to much. The rare earths controls is going to severely damage America. Trump is doing everything possible to destroy America. Internally this country is a powder keg in a weapons ammunition dump where everyone is playing with matches.

Regarding Venezuela the one smart thing Chavez and now Maduro have done that’s smart is having multiple armed groups. They have the Bolivarian militias,FAES,SEBIN,colectivos,national guard their ELN and demobilized FARC allies.
I don’t know how any post Chavez Venezuelan government will be able to disarm these many groups and govern effectively. Caracas alone will likely be a much more violent cities where super gangs become legit cartels. Venezuela will become the Libya of Latin America. A festering wound that will destabilize the region leading to blowback to the US.
 

JJD1803

Junior Member
Registered Member

you have to humiliate bullies to defeat them psychologically. The reason why they feel they have the ability to bully you is because they believe they are your superior. When you humiliate them and make them suffer, you are not only reversing the power imbalance, you are helping to train them become more upright human beings. It is either that or knocking them out completely to brain damage.

The thing about the entire rare earths is that you have to keep the new rules and only offer a “grace period” in return for something tangible like say zero tariffs and restrictions on Chinese goods, including Chinese cars. This is the same bs tactic they tried to use against China like offering a “grace period” of no tariffs in exchange for real rare earths.
It would hilarious that China did this move to pop the AI bubble which will pop the private equity bubble leading to a regional banking crisis creating a recession in the US that will make 2008 look like a vacation in the Bahamas. Also China is dumping treasury bonds meaning they won’t save the US economy like they did back in 2008/2009. US bond demand is plummeting. A recession means more bonds issued because less revenue means higher deficits. Demand will be much less meaning higher bond yields. This move was a kill shot to the US economy and China still has other hands it can play to cripple the US.
 

RobertC

Junior Member
Registered Member

FriedButter

Brigadier
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Trump's Sudden Shift on Putin Spurred by Russia Critic Rubio​

For months, President Donald Trump resisted calls to slap new sanctions on Russia, believing he could end the war in a deal with Vladimir Putin — including with a quick peace summit in the coming weeks in Budapest.

In a dramatic reversal this week, Trump canceled those plans and then went a step further, imposing the first direct sanctions on Moscow of his second term. “It was time,” Trump said.

But the sudden shift also grew from an assessment by Secretary of State Marco Rubio — a long-time Russia hawk who once called Putin a “gangster” — that Moscow had not made any substantive changes to its position, according to US and European officials familiar with the matter.

The people, who asked not to be identified discussing internal deliberations, said Rubio called off a planned in-person meeting with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov after the two men spoke by phone and it became apparent the Kremlin was trying, once again, to slow-walk ceasefire discussions and drag out the war.

Rubio’s influence in the administration’s change of heart signals an even more expansive role for the top US diplomat, who has also advocated for a more aggressive approach to Venezuela as Trump’s interim national security adviser. His stance contrasted with the more accommodating strategy toward Russia advocated by Trump’s long-time friend and special envoy Steve Witkoff.

White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly pushed back on the characterization of Rubio’s role.

“President Trump always leads on foreign policy, and his agenda is executed by national security officials like Secretary Rubio and Special Envoy Witkoff, who are one, unified team behind the President’s America First vision,” she said.

There’s no indication that Witkoff, one of Trump’s most trusted confidantes, has lost his standing on the Russia file with the president, or his influence more broadly. He was shuttling around the Middle East this week overseeing a fragile ceasefire in Gaza that he helped Trump negotiate.

But some of the people said Witkoff’s discussions with Putin and other top officials in the run-up to an earlier summit, in Alaska, led to confusion and the perception that Moscow was prepared to make concessions it had no intention of carrying out.

Kelly, the White House spokeswoman, denied that was the case. She said Witkoff is “clear with everyone” and he and Trump are working toward peace with “a complete and accurate understanding of all the factors at play.”

That August summit was tense as Putin insisted on negotiating about Ukrainian territory, frustrating Trump and leading him to nearly walk out of the room, the people said. This time, Rubio led the preparatory groundwork.

US Vice President JD Vance, left, special envoy Steve Witkoff, and Jared Kushner during a press conference on Oct. 21, 2025 in Kiryat Gat, Israel.Photographer: Nathan Howard/Getty Images
The State Department earlier characterized Rubio’s call with Lavrov as productive. Asked about Rubio’s role this time around, State Department spokesman Tommy Pigott said the “entire team is fully unified around President Trump’s leadership.”

People suggesting otherwise are wrong, he said. “Harmful actors are pushing selfish agendas through baseless lies,” he said. “President Trump and his team have already accomplished more in the pursuit of peace than anyone thought possible, and as the President said, that is in large part because of the unprecedented success of Special Envoy Witkoff.”

Despite the difficult first summit, Trump last week agreed to meet with Putin again after a lengthy phone call. US officials had hoped to capitalize on diplomatic momentum in the wake of Trump winning praise for helping secure a long-sought truce that ended two years of hostilities between Israel and Hamas.

Read More: US Sanctions Rosneft and Lukoil in Push For Ukraine Talks
But in recent days, Russia sent the US a plan outlining its terms for peace with Ukraine that rehashed all of its well-known positions, including demands Ukraine give up more territory, some of the people said.

“Last time, it took the meeting in Alaska for the US to realize that there’s no flexibility on the Russian side,” said Liana Fix, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations. “This time, this realization took place before the meeting, which is a good step.”

On the Russian side, there was also confusion.

Russian officials left the Putin-Trump call last week believing the US president had agreed to Russia’s demand that Kyiv give up the remainder of the strategic Donbas region in return for only modest territorial concessions by Moscow, according to a person familiar with the Kremlin’s thinking.

But a day later, after meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, Trump reiterated that he wanted a ceasefire along the current battle lines, an idea that Moscow had rejected ahead of the Alaska summit, this person said. Lavrov highlighted this disagreement in his call with Rubio on Monday, the person said.

By that point, the summit preparations were falling apart.

While Rubio sat down alongside Witkoff in Saudi Arabia when the administration first pursued direct talks with Russia back in February, his more direct involvement this time around has been a relief for many European officials who said they were worried that the US — under Witkoff’s guidance — could shift too far toward Russia’s position, piling pressure on Ukraine to accept Moscow’s demands.
During Trump’s meeting with Zelenskiy last week, for instance, Witkoff had again pressed the wartime leader to agree to Putin’s demands to cede the Donbas to Russia, the people familiar said.

On Wednesday, Trump’s administration slapped sanctions on Russia’s biggest oil producers, blacklisting state-run oil giant Rosneft PJSC and Lukoil PJSC.

“Every time I speak with Vladimir, I have good conversations, and then they just don’t go anywhere,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on Wednesday after the sanctions announcement, adding the White House may arrange a future meeting.

Rubio nevertheless left open the possibility of further engagement with Moscow, including future meetings.

Speaking to reporters on Wednesday night at Joint Base Andrews outside Washington before a trip to Israel and Asia, Rubio said “we’re always going to be interested in engaging if there’s an opportunity to achieve peace.”

“I think the President has said repeatedly, for a number of months now, that at some point he will have to do something if we don’t make progress on the peace deal,” Rubio said. “Today was the day he decided to do something.”
Some analysts believe that it‘s Rubio who‘s behind interventionist policies of the current administration. Apparently his line of thought has won over the MAGA isolationist rhetoric.

Trump’s Foreign Policy 2.0 is done for. Marco Rubio is proving himself to be an lite version of John Bolton as everyone expected. From the impeding invasion of Venezuela to convincing Trump on following Biden policy of Russia unconditional surrender.

Rubio’s influence in the administration’s change of heart signals an even more expansive role for the top US diplomat, who has also advocated for a more aggressive approach to Venezuela as Trump’s interim national security adviser.
 
Top