And 3rd strongest AF in the world IAF will work the RAF into the groundIs it going to be a crash course?
Last edited:
And 3rd strongest AF in the world IAF will work the RAF into the groundIs it going to be a crash course?
What's the point of even playing by the rules when clearily they are not being enforced properly? I'm actually surprised China has managed to get past most of the legal and compliance bs unlike other nations like Russia. All those years of officials quoting some very obscure rule to convince the emperor to have their ways still works today I guess.
You know I think it's better to be an enemy of India than to be neutral or worse it's "friend". Might be one of the best decisions China ever made.Well isn’t this ironic. The Indians will now be teaching the British to fly their own aircrafts.
Cheers to another bunch of lost decades.
I always found it funny how everyone just ignores the fact that for the first 10 years of Bitcoin's existence: the period where it's far easier to mine new coins than now, China made up more than half of the world's hash rate, and even after banning trading China continued to allow bitcoin mining for a few years afterwards.China has accumulated a non-insignificant quantity of bitcoin as well as gold. If the US loses dominance "too soon", I believe China would choose to coopt the cryptocurrency environment rather than destroy it or let it die, with some version (not necessarily the official digital yuan) of a digital yuan taking place of current USD backed stablecoins
In an interview with the South China Morning Post, top mathematician said a US professor had recently told him that “the American academic community is basically experiencing havoc like China’s Cultural Revolution”.
A number of Chinese-American researchers interviewed by the Post shared the same impression, describing their careers as “chaotic” and the path forward as looking increasingly uncertain.
...
During China’s Cultural Revolution, intellectuals were branded as enemies of the people – the “stinking ninth class” – under the slogan “the more you know, the more subversive you are”.
The the country’s largest research organisation and today the biggest in the world, was reduced during the turmoil from more than 100 institutes to fewer than 10.
Fang Shimin, a China-born researcher-turned-critic now living in the US, wrote on social media that the “new Trump-era Cultural Revolution”, like the Chinese experience, placed political loyalty above expertise.
He cited an October 2 report in the journal Science that said four directors from the National Institutes of Health were collectively fired, stripped of tenure and had their laboratories shut down.
“These academic positions will all have to be filled by laymen loyal to Trump, to faithfully execute the great leader’s instructions to destroy American scientific research,” Fang wrote.
You don't understand how supply chain works:In aggregate, China's electronics exports in 2024 were ~35% of the global total in exports (measured in US dollars). That still leaves ~65% for the rest of the world. China's market share in the global export of phones, tablets, laptops, TV screens, circuit boards, etc. are all in the range of 30-60%. China is clearly the biggest player in the supply chain, but does not have a monopoly.
Would banning exports of electronics cause a great deal of pain to importing countries? Yes, the supply shortage would instantly double or triple the price of most electronics. But it is not the equivalent of an embargo because there are other countries - from Vietnam to South Korea to India to Mexico to Japan - that could continue to supply the items and who would then gradually increase production. More importantly, China would do tremendous damage to itself in this situation, since the total value of its electronics exports are in the range of $1.2 trillion. That'd be a serious, serious hit to the Chinese economy.
So I'd question the idea that China could truly threaten an electronics embargo. It's only through the rare earths card (ie strictly controlling the export of any product that contains Chinese rare earths) that an electronics embargo becomes plausible and powerful. Against a "critical software" embargo from the US, the best solution remains embracing open source and making a diplomatic & financial push to build a global, parallel software ecosystem. Attempting to impose an electronics embargo (more so than is already imposed via rare earths) would be the wrong move, in my opinion.
They have the unique experience of intercepting PL-15 which the Brits think they might need in the future.Well isn’t this ironic. The Indians will now be teaching the British to fly their own aircrafts.
One thing I’ve wondered is if China has halted sorghum imports as well. It is also an important feed crop.
China is too big to sanction. If IOC kicks out China, it will just create its own rival olympic which most of the global south will likely attend thus splitting olympics.What's the point of even playing by the rules when clearily they are not being enforced properly? I'm actually surprised China has managed to get past most of the legal and compliance bs unlike other nations like Russia. All those years of officials quoting some very obscure rule to convince the emperor to have their ways still works today I guess.
You know I think it's better to be an enemy of India than to be neutral or worse it's "friend". Might be one of the best decisions China ever made.
From what I can see that raid happened around Center, Lafayette and Walker streets which are on peripheries of Chinatown; perhaps that is why not many Asians are seen in that video.Anybody seen the footage of the ICE raid on Canal Street in New York's Chinatown?