Miscellaneous News

iewgnem

Senior Member
Registered Member
Although I am pretty pro-China, I wonder if the PPP adjustment would be weaker for higher end research considering that the mix of western to domestic equipment ratio is still quite high and this article is in reality, a veiled "China threat article", and China still has a gap to catch up to or is just roughly equal and should not be lulled into a false sense of superiority.
Lab equipment doesn't need to be newly purchased for every new research and only make up small fraction of research cost, most professors can tell you they mostly ask money for people, not new equipment. Even for new equipment the actual expensive ones tend to be infrastructure related such as wind tunnels, supercomputers, cyclotrons, etc. The more expensive and bespoke something is the more likely it is to be domestic or just built in-house.

Commercial R&D might be different, but commercial R&D also don't publish nearly as much.

China is superior, it's past the time we pretend its not, being superior doesn't mean you have to be arrogant and China isn't going around refusing to collaborate with anyone. The idea that learning from others is weakness and arrogance is strength is very much an American thing, not China.
 

4Tran

Junior Member
Registered Member
I always wonde if or when china will start finding new agencies in other countries to question western NGOs. I mean western countries treat everything pro china as under Chinese influence, why can't china fund news agencies in places like Thailand or SEA and central Asia to have be same suspicions towards sUS NGO and USAID?
China has historically been pretty bad at doing that kind of thing so I'm not optimistic about prospects of something like this. What is more promising though is that these anti-Chinese media pieces are getting further and further divorced from reality. So as more people are exposed to what China actually is like, the propaganda loses its effect. Places like Central and Southeast Asia is already very exposed to Chinese representation so that propaganda was never very successful to begin with.
 

iewgnem

Senior Member
Registered Member
China has historically been pretty bad at doing that kind of thing so I'm not optimistic about prospects of something like this. What is more promising though is that these anti-Chinese media pieces are getting further and further divorced from reality. So as more people are exposed to what China actually is like, the propaganda loses its effect. Places like Central and Southeast Asia is already very exposed to Chinese representation so that propaganda was never very successful to begin with.
That's because China does have an agency for exposing western propaganda, it's called ByteDance
 

FairAndUnbiased

Brigadier
Registered Member

In Iran, Apple iPhones were banned from February 2023 to October 2024. There was significant unrest in Iran due to Apple being banned, which led to the iPhones being unbanned.

However, Apple has no actual business in Iran; in 2017, Apple banned Iranian apps and banned Iranian IPs from the AppStore, there is no authorized iPhone dealer in the country, and there are no Apple employees in Iran. Iranians are officially discriminated against by Apple. They must use VPNs to access even the AppStore. All iPhones in Iran are either used or smuggled.

Despite these severe restrictions - both a domestic ban and vendor side sanctions - the iPhone market share in Iran has always hovered around 10%. This was claimed by the video, but verified here:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Ayatollah Khamenei himself called for the ban of Apple iPhones. He did so via Twitter - posted from an iPhone.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

supersnoop

Colonel
Registered Member
I always wonde if or when china will start finding new agencies in other countries to question western NGOs. I mean western countries treat everything pro china as under Chinese influence, why can't china fund news agencies in places like Thailand or SEA and central Asia to have be same suspicions towards sUS NGO and USAID?

When you look at English media, it is natural that the US/Western ideals are amplified. In SEA, the Chinese influence networks are old, hundreds of years, they don’t work in the same way.
 

supercat

Colonel
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Article from The Economist - safe to ignore.

Such gaslighting by Trump means that a US attack is imminent. It seems that the Trump regime isn't really worried about Iran's nuclear weapons. They want regime change instead.

Go ahead. Make America's auto industry a dinosaur!

Senate Weighs Effectively Killing Rule That Drove Rise of Fuel-Efficient Cars​

Automakers split over measure to eliminate fines for failing to meet mileage standards that helped launch fuel-efficient mainstays like Toyota’s Prius

The Senate is weighing a major change to federal fuel-economy rules that would kneecap the policy that dramatically reduced gas consumption and helped create fuel-efficient cars like the Toyota Prius hybrid.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
5ej5i1P.gif

G1h1khz.gif

 
Top