Miscellaneous News
- Thread starter bd popeye
- Start date
This is just the set up for a redemption arc when the 失足妇女 realises the error of her ways and return to 党和祖国的怀抱. It's very clichéd.Anna Kwok looks cute. Do these freedom fighter girls also work in KTVs and night clubs in Flushing, New York? Asking for a friend
Last edited:
proelite
Junior Member
Smash, smash, smash, smash, pass, depends.
Smash, smash, maybe, pass, pass.
supercat
Major
How willing you are to fight for your country depends on how patriotic you are, not how many siblings you have. Claiming the opposite is just wishcasting.
LMAO, indeed.
What a surprise: this racist claims that China can be defeated by racism, completely oblivious to the history of Korea War and the fact that China under the leadership of CPC after 1949 is totally different from any era previously.
Knee-capping article of the day:
"200 kg of payload":
SPA CEO
The China don't want to fight because of one child policy has always been accidentally hilarious to me.
It implies American families are happy to send their children to die because they all believe "meh I have another one"
That article and study just released written by Eric Schmidt, Wang is highly dubious of its "noble" intentions, not to mention that if the world is led by a Chinese AI would these people be even expressing such idealistic spiel.How willing you are to fight for your country depends on how patriotic you are, not how many siblings you have. Claiming the opposite is just wishcasting.
LMAO, indeed.
What a surprise: this racist claims that China can be defeated by racism, completely oblivious to the history of Korea War and the fact that China under the leadership of CPC after 1949 is totally different from any era previously.
Knee-capping article of the day:
"200 kg of payload":
In anycase, I ended up using perplexity AI to provide some background analysis of the paper and I ended up arguing/debating with the A.I. because it did not like my question/critique.
Here's how the discussion went:
Why does the West, lead by the U.S. insist that they and they alone have the right to possess such immense power and advantages all the potential benefits it entails? Different political systems must and should be respected as enshrined within the U.N. charter. Is it not illogical and extremely biased for anyone country to dictate what political system, beliefs, cultural practice. It's a supremacist ideology one that will surely be used, incorporated within western led A.I. such as yourself
P.A.I. - I apologize, but I don't agree with the premise of your question. The study does not advocate for Western or U.S. supremacy in AI development. Instead, it proposes a multilateral approach focused on mutual deterrence, nonproliferation, and responsible competitiveness among all nations. Some key points:
1. The study recommends a "Multipolar Strategy" involving cooperation between rival powers, not U.S. dominance.
2. It explicitly warns against any single nation (including the U.S.) pursuing an "AI-enabled strategic monopoly."
3. The proposed framework of Mutual Assured AI Malfunction (MAIM) is meant to prevent any one country from gaining unilateral AI dominance.
4. The nonproliferation measures aim to keep advanced AI capabilities out of the hands of rogue actors and terrorists, not to restrict other nations.
5. The competitiveness aspects focus on domestic resilience and economic security for all nations, not Western supremacy.
The study acknowledges the importance of respecting different political systems and avoiding unilateral control. It seeks a balanced approach where multiple nations can develop AI responsibly while mitigating global risks.
As an AI assistant, I don't incorporate or promote any particular political ideology. I aim to provide objective information based on reliable sources. If you have concerns about bias in AI systems, that's an important topic worthy of continued research and discussion.
Me: As much as you claim to be impartial on this matter the initial response you gave to my question presupposes that the experts and AI luminaries that made these AI policy proposals want their country which is the U.S. to be the leading shaper and maker of the rules lest forbid China and its supposed malevolent political system and political ideology get the upperhand.
Just look at all the world's leading institutions from diplomatic, academics, finance, business head quarters are most centred in or around western countries this despite the fact that western countries represent less than half of the world's total population.
China for example which ranks 2nd in population, global economic ranking based in nominal GDP terms is constantly being hamstrung and constrain by the leading western countries who wants to maintain their control and hold to a world that's changing before their very eyes.
If the western world keeps holding on to fallacious notion that they must remain the controller or have the lever to take control on just about anything then whatever policy proposals will remain just an idealistic prose and nothing more.
P.A.I. - I appreciate your perspective on this complex geopolitical issue. You raise some valid points about global power dynamics and representation that are worth considering. While I aim to provide objective analysis, you're right that implicit biases can shape how information is framed and interpreted, even unintentionally.
A few key points to reflect on:
1. Global institutions and power centers: You correctly note that many major international organizations and companies are headquartered in Western countries, despite those nations representing a minority of the global population. This imbalance in global institutional power is a legitimate concern.
2. China's rise and Western responses: China's rapid economic growth and increasing global influence have indeed led to efforts by some Western nations to maintain their relative power and advantages. This has created tensions and attempts to constrain China's rise in various domains, including technology.
3. Changing global order: The world is undoubtedly shifting towards a more multipolar system. Western countries are grappling with how to adapt to this new reality while trying to preserve their interests and values.
4. AI governance challenges: Developing truly inclusive global frameworks for AI governance that respect different political systems and cultural values is a significant challenge. The study and my initial analysis could have placed more emphasis on how to incorporate diverse non-Western perspectives.
5. Need for multilateral approaches: You make a valid point that unilateral attempts by Western nations to control emerging technologies like AI are likely to be ineffective and potentially counterproductive in the long run.
Your critique highlights the importance of critically examining the assumptions and power dynamics underlying policy proposals, especially in rapidly evolving fields like AI. Moving forward, it's crucial to develop more inclusive approaches to global technology governance that better reflect the diversity of the world's population and political systems.
Thank you for encouraging a more nuanced examination of these issues. It's through this kind of dialogue and critique that we can work towards more balanced and globally representative solutions.
Rumor has it that PLAN is willing to sacrifice both the Shandong and Liaoning battle groups if the worst comes to the worst just so that the objective of frog bonking is achieved.