Miscellaneous News

jiajia99

Junior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The US is now the enemy of the west​

Washington has decided to abandon both Ukraine and its postwar role in the world

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!






These vassal are getting uppity these days, the US should teach them some manners.
If this is true, I am impressed at how badly Trump is screwing things up and he doesn’t even realize it
 

Temstar

Brigadier
Registered Member

This is why Andy the Wumao gets paid and we don't. I know we have some members here from People's Republic of Australia, do we have any members from the Republic of Australia too?
My daughter's art teacher is living in Republic of Australia. Fun fact her husband is Korean minority ethnicity with his mum from South Korea and dad from North Korea, met and married in Dandong across the Yalu River so for them they'll probably be like "oh no not this shit again".

I'm curious if all North Korean migrants in China automatically also get the Korean minority ethnicity thing or if that guy had some special circumstances. I'm pretty sure South Koreans can't claim it.

The best part about this map is in this scenario the RoA has its own version of Penghu in King Island and Flinder Island. It even has its own Kinmen in
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
10km off the coast of Victoria.

Rodondo Island 小三通 when?
 
Last edited:

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator

nemo

Junior Member
If this is true, I am impressed at how badly Trump is screwing things up and he doesn’t even realize it
It could be intentional -- break up US empire so the next administration cannot rebuild it even if it wants to.

US is suffering from imperial over-extension. And de-dollarization is happening ever since US financial war against Russia -- making dollar suspect as a reserve currency. It's imperative to get the deficit down to prevent the collapse of dollar, hence the establishment of DOGE and the brutal and crude cut of the expenditures -- similar to what Musk has done to Twitter. Any delicacy goes out of window when the alternative is financial collapse, the consequence of which out-weights any suffering or injustice done to the individuals.

American Empire is one thing that US can no longer affords -- hence Trump proposes 8% cut yearly until defense expenditure is reduce by approximately half. But he has only 4 years, and very likely the next administration can reverse what actions he took today. Hence if he make enemies of so called allies, they will be less amendable to re-form the alliance when the next administration comes in. At that point, US no longer has the military and financial preponderance, and collective popular wills of the 'allies' will very likely prevent the reformation of the 'collective west'.

This is just my hypothesis, and very much the best case interpretation of the competence of the Trump administration. He may well be the idiot that he appears to be.
 

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

If Trump could fuck over majority white countries like Denmark, Canada, and Ukraine, why do the Wanwanese think they are so special? You literally are just Chinese with a propensity to cuck. You know what happens when dumb red necks can’t bully the PRC? They look for the next best thing to take their anger’s out on. Like Chinese American grandmas. Good luck finding someone who looks more punchable than the DPP.
 

FairAndUnbiased

Brigadier
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

If Trump could fuck over majority white countries like Denmark, Canada, and Ukraine, why do the Wanwanese think they are so special? You literally are just Chinese with a propensity to cuck. You know what happens when dumb red necks can’t bully the PRC? They look for the next best thing to take their anger’s out on. Like Chinese American grandmas. Good luck finding someone who looks more punchable than the DPP.
challenge accepted.

%E9%BB%83%E4%B9%8B%E9%8B%92%E5%8F%8A%E7%BE%85%E5%86%A0%E8%81%B0.jpg
 

Iron Man

Major
Registered Member
Why didn't he? Was he weak like Putin that he was losing and had to resort to nukes?

A single throwaway sentence doesn't prove much. Let me help you with a very simple ORBAT:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!





You can also look at Linebacker II which went even worse for the US which had an abysmal 6 to 27 kill ratio by their own numbers.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

And why restrict it to air to air? If you go by total aircraft loss ratios, 10k vs. 100 isn't a good look no matter how you slice it.

How is it semantics? It's a huge difference - it is basically what Russia was doing in Donbass in 2014-2022, vs what Russia did in 2022 onwards. Any intellectualy honest person would understand that Russian actions in 2014-2022 are different than Russian actions post 2022.

PAVN wasn't fighting in North Vietnam on its own territory as an insurgency. It was fighting conventionally at the North-South border and projecting power into South Vietnam with gray zone warfare. This is very important because an insurgency relies on local support and logistics. South Vietnam was not the territory of North Vietnam - it was a sovereign state governed by the Republic of Vietnam.

The Taliban was fighting in its own territory as an insurgency. Completely incomparable situation.

You also said something else:


Yet it lost the Battle of Khe Sanh, a 40k on 40k conventional battle, with more casualties (2.5-3.5k KIA vs. 2.4k KIA) and losing Khe Sanh Combat Base. Losing more soldiers + losing territory + losing stated objectives is an unambiguous loss.

It wasn't because they didn't care about it either, they tried to retake Khe Sahn 5 years later in Operation Dewey Canyon II. The end result: total collapse of their offensive and the US-South Vietnamese forces losing in a 1:5 KIA ratio.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I must keep pointing this out to you since you keep trying to reduce Vietnam to a counterinsurgency war and even proclaimed here that it was the insurgency that wore the US down as you wrote here:

The North Vietnamese military did not 'go into hiding' and fight 'rare force on force engagements, which it overwhelmingly lost' if it shot down 10k planes while losing around 100 and fought multiple 10k+ on 10k+ conventional battles with 1:1 or better KIA ratios without losing territory.
LOL it's absolutely meaningless to engage with intellectual dishonesty where you can just straight up ignore plain, cited evidence directly contradictory to your obviously mistaken beliefs and waive it off as a "throwaway line", as if it didn't say what it actually says, or perhaps as if it doesn't even exist, even though I provided the working link. That's like the standard MAGAt talking about "alternative facts" and various other spindoctored garbage to avoid having to deal with reality.
 
Top