Miscellaneous News

S

Serb

Senior Member
Registered Member
gpt said:
Of course. "PRC is the only country with the capability and will to challenge the United States across all domains" is something that is repeated over and over again for a reason.
Click to expand...
It should be like this: "By this point, China had become the only power defeating us across nearly all domains for the first time so far in our history. To have any chance of competing next and preventing the gap from widening even further, we had to shut down all global soft intelligence interference operations, including USAID and NED, while also attempting to sacrifice Ukraine and abandon Europe to Russia."
 
T

tygyg1111

Major
Registered Member
name said:
There are universal principles that work - being first, framing, word choice, repetition, simplification, working on emotion, social proof, etc. I want them to use effective universal principles. It has no nationality. The West uses the universal principles to win.

Is using a double blind research experiment setup becoming Western? You're conflating things.

The usa successfully shifted the blame for their biological weapons attack onto the victim, China. They got a lot of Middle Easterners to believe China committed genocide on Uyghurs. People still believe tank man got run over by a tank. They duped Chinese people into thinking the West is a utopia. The vast majority of people are not high iq. Good luck with avoiding people getting duped.


These are universal principles that work. Knowing what they are and when to use them is a skill. For example see
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
- things that are repeated often are more likely to be believed whether they are true or false.


This is not for you to decide. China already wants to "tell China's story better". And the best way to do that is to use effective communication tactics that are universal. Tiktok is global and can reach users (possibly excluding usa in the future). Tiktok refugees at XHS show that Western hard power control is not invincible.


The example is irrelevant to soft power / psychological warfare. You're talking about their internal speaking style within an organization. How is "- under promise, over deliver" going to help counter a Western psyop like the Xinjiang atrocity propaganda?


Again, there are universal principles that work. No one is is saying China should lie, exaggerate, be a mouth cannon, spread hate, etc like the imperial West. For example, is it going to ruin our culture to use more repetition so an idea sticks? If so, how?

China has already westernized a lot. The politburo wears western suits and ties. Disney has theme parks brainwashing Chinese kids all day long inside China. We have night clubs, bars, raves, extreme feminism, plastic surgery to look more Western, a lot of Christian converts, celebrate Christmas, obesity, etc. Using universal communication principles should be the least of your worries.


That doesn't apply to using universal communication principles.

This is not going to change Chinese culture. It's not going to Westernize anyone. It's like you're freaking out over Indian mental-math shortcuts. Using the shortcuts changes nothing about Chinese culture. It just makes math easier to do.

Using universal communication principles doesn't change Chinese culture. It just makes influence easier to achieve. Do you understand?
Click to expand...
Can you give us an example of how you would tell China's story better, on a topic and format of your choosing?
 
Chevalier

Chevalier

Major
Registered Member
coolgod said:
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1890210640662495590
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1890207291619893311

World's greatest scammer meets Donald Trump in the White House.
Click to expand...
This is basically the equivalent of the indian backoffice staff meeting the anglo american corporate heads.
coolgod said:
The original source of that piece

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

China Tries to Play the Role of Peacemaker in Ukraine​

U.S. and Europe would view Beijing’s proposal skeptically given its close ties to Moscow​




I think the recent hints are too clear.
Click to expand...
they actually hate the fact that they have to defer to the non white great yellow peril to play peacemaker because their white supremacist states are too barbaric and uncivilised to look after themselves. I can tell it makes 360 Baerbock and von der lying rage.
 
I

iewgnem

Captain
Registered Member
ACuriousPLAFan said:
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1890167562987556869

By the way, didn't certain US think tanks claimed that China's actual "muh PPP" defense budget is something like 700+ billion USD instead of just 250-300+ billion USD?

China should agree to Trump's proposal, and "halve" her own 700+ billion USD defense budget to 350+ billion* USD.

View attachment 145619

Trump: "Win-Win for both sides of the Pacific!"

Xi (thinking to himself): "Thanks Trump, you just gave me an additional 50-100+ billion USD* of defense budget for absolutely no reason lmfao"

View attachment 145620
Click to expand...
Trump might as well just say America is broke and can't afford its military budget.
Which means all China has to offer is agreeing not to double its own defence budget in exchange for US halving theirs.

Or China can always play the "per capta" card for the lolz
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top