Miscellaneous News

Sardaukar20

Captain
Registered Member
It's more like since they're not getting USAID money anymore they have to stop talking bad about China. Otherwise if they say bad about China weather they get paid or not then why should Trump pay you? It's like what Joker says, if you're good at something never do it for free.
Well, if USAID is their motivation, then its gonna come back online when Trump is gone, or when he changes his mind. And then its business as usual. Still, the BBC's main funding comes from the British government, so I doubt that USAID has much to do with this.

The BBC knows that their decade long anti-China campaign is running out of steam. Since positive China stories are trending very well these days, the BBC is more than likely, trying to appeal to the "China Good" crowd, hoping to influence them in the future.
 

jiajia99

Junior Member
Registered Member
I would caution against interpreting this 'turn' by the BBC as something positive. The Western media is notorious for throwing out sweets once in awhile. They would pretend to align with some popular sentiments, to draw in more viewers and build their influence. Then after awhile, they would pivot around and pump out the standard propaganda. They have done this before with the Iraq War, where they appear to align with the Anti-War movement crowds. Then later firing them up to support the Arab Spring. They sympathized with the Occupy Wall Street movement crowds, and then later firing them up to support the HK Umbrella riots.

The BBC prior to Xi Jinping's arrival to office in 2012 was also quite China-friendly. Some of their China articles up to 2013 were written by Martin Jacques if I'm not mistaken. Then by 2013, the BBC installed that Chinahawk Carrie Gracie in China and everything pivoted to "China Bad" ever since. It is only a matter of time again before the BBC returns to business as usual. So I'm not celebrating this "turn" by the BBC. I will never allow myself to be fooled by the Western media ever again.
Oh no, the BBC will never be pro China nor will they say anything positive about China without ulterior motives but any time they focus on the USA and less on China is still a win no matter how small. On the plus side, with a reputation that is crashing and burning along with the cutting off from the funds from the US should count for something given how invincible this news outlet has been for so long. Then again, this doesn’t really mean much in the grand scheme of things because let’s face it, what has the BBC really accomplished against China recently that actually is worth a damn
 

Overbom

Brigadier
Registered Member
If France were to ever buy India's Pinaka MLRS, there is a good chance that those might end up in Ukraine. If its something for the French Army to use, they should be looking at South Korea.
Russia buying bs stuff from India and thus funding it. Then India exporting MLRS to France which then gives them to Ukraine to kill Russians. Is Putin the biggest joke in this scenario?
 

TK3600

Major
Registered Member
Xi knows you are snakes hence the the recent appointment for European Affairs. He knows, he is ready

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!






Lets carve up Europe between US, Russia and China. No need to deal with cucks themselves when they are om the chopping block




Ah yes, the popular move of sending a carrier and then playing nice. Macaroni trying gunboat diplomacy? Don't think he will get anything out of this




If she tries any of her usual stupid stuff, Wang Yi will indeed chew her alive. Just look at what he did to Little Marco recently, he is still recovering from that

I don't think he's interested in looking at grannies with saggy breasts.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

In UK, rise of Indian-origin extremist ideologies risks deepening divisions: analysts​

UK Home Office report marks Hindutva as ideology of concern, while analysts note ‘very serious’ issue of Sikh separatism fuelling radicalism​

Indian colonisation of British Isles is poetic justice. Jai Hind but unironically.
 

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Last edited:

Chevalier

Captain
Registered Member
It's more like since they're not getting USAID money anymore they have to stop talking bad about China. Otherwise if they say bad about China weather they get paid or not then why should Trump pay you? It's like what Joker says, if you're good at something never do it for free.
Rather, the billionaire Anglo oligarchs of these media stations are now dependant on chinas good graces to keep being a billionaire class, especially now that their USAID Clinton soros scam is gone.


By way of generational comparison of millennials, China has Liang Wenfeng and the Anglos has SBF and the other Sam of OpenAI. The future is a no contest.
The very best of ashkenazi IQ could only give us desert Bronze Age scammers typical of religious cult leaders demanding human sacrifices to keep the sun from going out.
Russia buying bs stuff from India and thus funding it. Then India exporting MLRS to France which then gives them to Ukraine to kill Russians. Is Putin the biggest joke in this scenario?
Stupid things the Russians do because they think it’ll “keep China in check”. russians better get with the program and stop believing they are a superpower, able to get India to fight China on their behalf so they can get favourable terms from China. Both will learn to kowtow before the dragon throne.
 

sheogorath

Major
Registered Member
Stupid things the Russians do because they think it’ll “keep China in check”. russians better get with the program and stop believing they are a superpower, able to get India to fight China on their behalf so they can get favourable terms from China. Both will learn to kowtow before the dragon throne.
This is MAGA levels of conspiracy theory.
 
Top