Miscellaneous News

Randomuser

Senior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

U.S. Funding Dispute With World Anti-Doping Agency Boils Over​

After the Biden administration withheld funding to the agency, saying it had lost confidence in its ability to police elite athletes, WADA removed the United States from its board.

The fallout from the disclosure that the World Anti-Doping Agency did not discipline a slew of Chinese swimmers who tested positive for a banned drug erupted on Wednesday after the Biden administration said it withheld major funding for the agency and the agency removed the American government’s representative from its board.

The United States had held back its funding to the agency, known as WADA, after losing faith in its ability to guard against the use of banned performance-enhancing drugs at events like the Olympics, the White House said.

The decision by the Biden administration was a significant blow to WADA, which has been under intense scrutiny for decisions not to punish or more aggressively investigate positive tests for banned substances by elite Chinese swimmers in recent years.

On Wednesday, the antidoping agency responded by removing the United States, which had been the single largest country funder to the agency, from a position on its board.
 
Last edited:

Fatty

Junior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

U.S. Funding Dispute With World Anti-Doping Agency Boils Over​

After the Biden administration withheld funding to the agency, saying it had lost confidence in its ability to police elite athletes, WADA removed the United States from its board.
lol honestly I don’t know why but it seems the US is even more of a whiner than usual recently. Basically they want WADA to punish China for something that is iffy at best but they don’t want WADA to punish them for hiding dopers.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

“In one case, an elite level athlete, who competed at Olympic qualifier and international events in the United States, admitted to taking steroids and EPO yet was permitted to continue competing all the way up to retirement. Their case was never published, results never disqualified, prize money never returned, and no suspension ever served. The athlete was allowed to line up against their unknowing competitors as if they had never cheated. In that case, when USADA eventually admitted to WADA what had been going on, it advised that any publication of consequences or disqualification of results would put the athlete’s security at risk and asked WADA to agree to non-publication. Being put in this impossible position, WADA had no choice but to agree (after verifying with its Intelligence and Investigations Department that the security threat was credible). The athlete’s doping was therefore never made public.”
 

pmc

Major
Registered Member
1200 acres? That was yesterday when it started at 20 acres. It is now +16,000 acres burning about few hours ago.

Hurricane winds blowing fire + no available water for fire fighting.
California reservoirs are nearly full. All they needed was building 21st century Air tanker that scoop water directly. for some reason this rich people not have this thinking.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

GOODTREE

New Member
Registered Member
Or it could be intentionally done to burn down enough land for the US corporations to buy up those lands while those insurers cancelling all those covers means that they will save on having to insure all those people that lost their homes.
Since you're talking about this...
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

"Yet ANOTHER massive fire has just sparked in Studio City, with several structures engulfed"
"This is in a totally different area of Los Angeles than the other fires"
 

ACuriousPLAFan

Brigadier
Registered Member
It's interesting because around the time when China was importing J-11 there were voices in PLAAF saying Flanker is so much better than the then in development J-10 and the project should be dropped and the funds made available to buy more J-11. It went all the way to the top to Jiang Zemin who was very supportive of J-10 program because he understood the need to nurture domestic aircraft R&D to pave the way for future aircraft. He apparently smashed a teacup in front of PLAAF people and yelled at them telling them he doesn't want to hear from them again asking to cancel J-10.

While certainly the correct decision in retrospect as the experience gained by CAC eventually lead to the J-20 and J-36 today, Elder was taking on risk by supporting J-10, not only placing trust in CAC's ability to deliver but also it meant China had to take geopolitical threats on the chin in the meanwhile to not spark off any wars while they PLA was in a relatively weak state. Hence Yinhe incident, bombing of Belgrade embassy in 1999 and Hainan EP-3 incident in 2001.

Now that something similar is playing out in India I'm wondering if the decision to stick with Tejas is correct and could J-10 ended up going the same way if CAC was like HAL.

Apart from the Elder, General Liu Huaqing (yes, the same person who pushed CV-16 Liaoning and subsequent Chinese aircraft carriers into reality today) are also fundamental in bring the J-10 into reality.

Without them, there will be no J-10 in 1998. Without J-10, there will be no J-20 in 2011; and without J-20, there will be no J-36 in 2024.

In fact, this is yet to include the impacts brought by cross-institute cooperation and collaboration between Chengdu and Shenyang since the J-10, which eventually brought us the J-35/A and also the J-XDS in 2024.

We really owe our thanks to them both for putting their foot down back in the 1990s.

pika-1736404778484-1x.png
 
Top