Miscellaneous News

name

Junior Member
Registered Member
It's amazing that the NGO-media-policy industrial complex can make a non-issue into a genocide involving one million err I'm sorry three millions Uighurs going through reeducation camp aka internment aka concentration camp plus forced labor plus sexual slaves. They have been quite successful judging from how brainwashed the western population and politicians on this. What kind of diplomacy would China have to deploy against such an odd? I would say they're doing not too bad giving the odds.

There's no excuse for the atrocious track record of Chinese diplomacy and its media against these lies. One can simply compare 3-5 minute videos by the likes of Max Blumenthal and Ajit Singh of The Greyzone. They have next to no funding, no team, etc. Why are they so effective? They get to the point and they expose the hypocrisy, fake ngo Trojan Horses, fake news/propaganda, destroy the perceived credibility of Western "news", crimes and standard operating procedure of the Western imperialists.

Now, compare that to Chinese media like CGTN. It is long winded pointless rambling for close to 30 minutes. When I finish watching their shows, I feel like I wasted time. I learn next to nothing and most importantly, I don't even get the sense that the West is using terrorism or spreading lies against China. Chinese media/communication are awful.

I'll give specific examples of how utterly useless Chinese media is

Example 1
The Greyzone refers to Adrian Zenz as a right Christian homophobic fanatic.
Chinese media refers to Adrian Zenz as a researcher.
The Chinese have a chance to instantly annihilate his credibility but they act like his PR agent instead.

Example 2
The Greyzone refers to Western propaganda as propaganda, lies or, disinformation.
Chinese media refers to Western propaganda as misunderstandings or incorrect information.
Once again, Chinese media act like the PR agency for Western terrorists by using euphemisms to downplay Western criminality.

Example 3
The Greyzone refers to the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) as the CIA's arm to overthrow democracies.
The Chinese media refers to National Endowment for Democracy (NED) as an ngo.
I hope I don't need to repeat myself here.

Keep in mind, some people will write excuses about how it's about funding, global reach, etc. It's nonsense. CGTN has millions of followers/subscribers. That's enough. They have a giant budget. They should have an army of researchers and programmers who can organize its content.

I have only scratched the surface. If China wants to survive and defeat Western imperialists then these excuses need to stop. Secondly, they should learn how to perform the most basic media functions instead of acting like a pr agency for their enemies.
 

voyager1

Captain
Registered Member
There's no excuse for the atrocious track record of Chinese diplomacy and its media against these lies. One can simply compare 3-5 minute videos by the likes of Max Blumenthal and Ajit Singh of The Greyzone. They have next to no funding, no team, etc. Why are they so effective? They get to the point and they expose the hypocrisy, fake ngo Trojan Horses, fake news/propaganda, destroy the perceived credibility of Western "news", crimes and standard operating procedure of the Western imperialists.

Now, compare that to Chinese media like CGTN. It is long winded pointless rambling for close to 30 minutes. When I finish watching their shows, I feel like I wasted time. I learn next to nothing and most importantly, I don't even get the sense that the West is using terrorism or spreading lies against China. Chinese media/communication are awful.

I'll give specific examples of how utterly useless Chinese media is

Example 1
The Greyzone refers to Adrian Zenz as a right Christian homophobic fanatic.
Chinese media refers to Adrian Zenz as a researcher.
The Chinese have a chance to instantly annihilate his credibility but they act like his PR agent instead.

Example 2
The Greyzone refers to Western propaganda as propaganda, lies or, disinformation.
Chinese media refers to Western propaganda as misunderstandings or incorrect information.
Once again, Chinese media act like the PR agency for Western terrorists by using euphemisms to downplay Western criminality.

Example 3
The Greyzone refers to the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) as the CIA's arm to overthrow democracies.
The Chinese media refers to National Endowment for Democracy (NED) as an ngo.
I hope I don't need to repeat myself here.

Keep in mind, some people will write excuses about how it's about funding, global reach, etc. It's nonsense. CGTN has millions of followers/subscribers. That's enough. They have a giant budget. They should have an army of researchers and programmers who can organize its content.

I have only scratched the surface. If China wants to survive and defeat Western imperialists then these excuses need to stop. Secondly, they should learn how to perform the most basic media functions instead of acting like a pr agency for their enemies.
Agreed. Chinese media are useless in pushing China's narratives.

I think what is needed is to have a diverse and competitive Chinese media field so that the best media would be on top. However we know that this is impossible.

No way the CPC will allow an open field of chinese media to jumb the firewall and do their own reporting
 

Sanctioned Mike Pompeo lands a well paid gig at Fox News. Fox News earns billions through advertising revenue each year and the major advertisers are Nestle, General Motors, Toyota , Liberty Insurance & other corporate entities etc (who all have significant presence in China).
Now if China cant pressure these companies to drop Fox News then its sanctions would be viewed as toothless in the West.
Fat pomp is under sanction. Good opportunity to sanction and ban Fox under legal rule of law.
 

horse

Colonel
Registered Member
Not sure where to put this but this is from an Intelligence Squared Debate:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


"Even if China were to change and adapted our constitution and our laws wholesale, we should still try to limit their growth merely because we shouldn't have a peer competitor. We must stop them even if it means pushing them back towards poverty"

IMHO, this seems to be the mentality of the Anglo-American establishment in general, no genuine competition is wanted. Dominance and general Anglo-American Supremacy are desired.

Yet India and some other countries think it is a good idea to align themselves with the Anglo-American block.
They are just being silly.

Here is just one example, the RCEP.

The RCEP already is the largest trading block in the world.

The RCEP will double in size in 10-15 years, increasing incomes for all involved.

The RCEP would be the fastest growing economic region in the world.

The RCEP would have economies of scale for their companies that will dwarf other regions in the world, giving those companies a real competitive edge.

There is nothing the United States can do to counter this, unless they do a first strike. Then of course, the retaliatory strike will come.

That is the Americans today, they have no idea what to do, they feel helpless and can only talk, talk, and talk.

It is that expression, put up or shut up. But they won't do either. That is kind of funny.

The world is passing them on by.

Note, the RCEP is only one example of China's increasing footprint in the world.

:p
 

hashtagpls

Senior Member
Registered Member
Not sure where to put this but this is from an Intelligence Squared Debate:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


"Even if China were to change and adapted our constitution and our laws wholesale, we should still try to limit their growth merely because we shouldn't have a peer competitor. We must stop them even if it means pushing them back towards poverty"

IMHO, this seems to be the mentality of the Anglo-American establishment in general, no genuine competition is wanted. Dominance and general Anglo-American Supremacy are desired.

Yet India and some other countries think it is a good idea to align themselves with the Anglo-American block.
One good thing about the events of the past 4 years is that the Anglos/Five Eyes have had to come clean about their race based vision for the world; no more hiding behind fallacies or lies about "first amongst equals". Anglos only want slaves, slaves who adhere to the "Rules Based World Order" which just so happens to place Anglo Five Eyes as the apex of the pyramid.

In the case of the Indian psyche, it is similar to some japanese like Shinzo Abe: they'd much rather be ruled over by a foreign Anglo than admit that they are weak and unable to lead, lacking moral fortitude, spine and courage to lead their people to a better future. They have led and continue to lead their people into bondage.
 

emblem21

Major
Registered Member
True. If China survives Peak Oil and the Thucydides Trap, then one day when the tables are turned China will do the same to the US.
Would I be a really cruel person if I said that the USA complete deserves this treatment if not worse. Also good to see you again
 

hashtagpls

Senior Member
Registered Member
Would I be a really cruel person if I said that the USA complete deserves this treatment if not worse. Also good to see you again
No, you'd be human.
All this christian "turn the other cheek" was how canny imperialists got Asians/Africans under their tutelage to not wage vengeance against them.

For instance, my proposal for a FVEYEs defeat is that all Anglos who waged war on China are to vacate the lands of the americas, australia and NZ and banished back to their ancestral island.
 

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General
Here's some news on that Chinese grandmother who beat her attacker. The public defender who looks Asian but has a Western name claims the attack wasn't racist because security camera footage shows he was a victim too. Yes, before the attack on the Asian grandmother, the attacker was being attacked by three other individuals so because he was angry, he punch two old Asians out of frustration. And they say there isn't such a thing as white privilege. Even when you're a homeless white guy, he can go after two old Asian people and punch them because others beat him up beforehand. Maybe this public defender should move to Texas and run for Congress representing TX-06.
 

emblem21

Major
Registered Member
Not sure where to put this but this is from an Intelligence Squared Debate:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


"Even if China were to change and adapted our constitution and our laws wholesale, we should still try to limit their growth merely because we shouldn't have a peer competitor. We must stop them even if it means pushing them back towards poverty"

IMHO, this seems to be the mentality of the Anglo-American establishment in general, no genuine competition is wanted. Dominance and general Anglo-American Supremacy are desired.

Yet India and some other countries think it is a good idea to align themselves with the Anglo-American block.
Sooner or later, the USA is going to find themselves as a whole going down to a level that is lower then poverty with the way they are trying there absolute hardest to not only avoid the truth but also to avoid fixing the real problems that is just so obvious at this point
 
  • Like
Reactions: H2O

Tyler

Captain
Registered Member
Sooner or later, the USA is going to find themselves as a whole going down to a level that is lower then poverty with the way they are trying there absolute hardest to not only avoid the truth but also to avoid fixing the real problems that is just so obvious at this point
The US is going to export their $US treasuries, oil and agricultural products to other countries.
 
Top