Miscellaneous News
- Thread starter bd popeye
- Start date
What you think?
As far as I'm aware this is the first time China exercised third party "long arm" sanctions
This is pretty significant if enforced, since almost all supply chain pass through China, if China start exercising this kind of sanctions on other industries, it can cut US from a huge chunk if not the entirety of global manufacturing.
George Soros-funded and U.S. gov't-sponsored puppets 'human rights activists' in the UK like Luke de Pulford (who made a whole career of meddling in the internal affairs of the Asian continent) appear to be quite worried about the "extremely dangerous situation" in U.S.-Occupied Korea because the potential new president Lee from the opposition might be - *gasp* - less hawkish on China.
The embattled incumbent president Yoon facing impeachment (the 'democratic' one who recently imposed martial law on the whole country in a move to clamp down on his "despicable pro-North Korean" political opponents in South Korea) thus also accused his opposition of being not hawkish enough on the DPRK.
Continued:
As reported by The Chosun Daily, during a campaign rally in March, Lee Jae-myung, the leader of South Korea’s main opposition Democratic Party of Korea (DPK) which won a landslide victory in April's parliamentary election, questioned, “Why keep pestering China?”. With a gesture of clasping his hands together, he suggested that a simple “xièxie” (thank you) to China and also expressing gratitude to Taiwan should suffice. “Why bother meddling everywhere?” He further questioned the relevance of the Taiwan Strait issue to South Korea, asking, “Whatever happens in the Taiwan Strait, whatever happens with China and Taiwan’s domestic issues, what does it matter to us?”.
These sensible questions by presidential hopeful Lee, indicating a readiness for taking a more moderate approach and a potential political shift for South Korea to focus more on urgent domestic affairs instead of acting as a neo-colonial military proxy for U.S.-led overseas wars in Asia, appear to have rattled Soros' British puppets like Luke de Pulford. He tweeted on X how "extremely dangerous" it is that the potential next president of a foreign country located thousands of miles away from Britain is "extremely" pro-friendly towards another foreign country located on the other side of the planet from Britain. In other words, how "extremely dangerous" it is that U.S.-Occupied Korea is trying to jump off the NATO-led war wagon and instead build better relations with its actual neighbours in Asia.
South Korea's Western-hijacked MSM 'newspaper of record', The Chosun Daily (Chosun Ilbo), also fearmongered about this potential moderate turn for the country as "sparking concern".
Luke de Pulford is a member of the UK Tory party's 'Human Rights' Commission and the founder and executive director of IPAC (Inter-Parliamentary Alliance against on China), an international, cross-party alliance of parliamentarians from 'democratic' countries focused on browbeating and demonising China.
IPAC is reportedly financed by the Open Society Foundations of George Soros, the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), which is funded by the U.S. gov't, and by the Taiwan Foundation for Democracy.
It's ironic that Sorosite hawks like de Pulford try to fearmonger about South Korea potentially taking a moderate position on the "One China Principle", when Pulford's sponsor, the U.S. gov't, itself signed off on the "One China Principle" in official joint documented agreements in the 1970s. The 1972 joint statement says that the U.S. "acknowledges that [...] there is but one China and that Taiwan is a part of China" and "does not challenge that position". But of course NATO's war hawks pretend to have selective amnesia about those agreements (which are still current and were never officially revoked).
The embattled incumbent president Yoon facing impeachment (the 'democratic' one who recently imposed martial law on the whole country in a move to clamp down on his "despicable pro-North Korean" political opponents in South Korea) thus also accused his opposition of being not hawkish enough on the DPRK.
Continued:
As reported by The Chosun Daily, during a campaign rally in March, Lee Jae-myung, the leader of South Korea’s main opposition Democratic Party of Korea (DPK) which won a landslide victory in April's parliamentary election, questioned, “Why keep pestering China?”. With a gesture of clasping his hands together, he suggested that a simple “xièxie” (thank you) to China and also expressing gratitude to Taiwan should suffice. “Why bother meddling everywhere?” He further questioned the relevance of the Taiwan Strait issue to South Korea, asking, “Whatever happens in the Taiwan Strait, whatever happens with China and Taiwan’s domestic issues, what does it matter to us?”.
These sensible questions by presidential hopeful Lee, indicating a readiness for taking a more moderate approach and a potential political shift for South Korea to focus more on urgent domestic affairs instead of acting as a neo-colonial military proxy for U.S.-led overseas wars in Asia, appear to have rattled Soros' British puppets like Luke de Pulford. He tweeted on X how "extremely dangerous" it is that the potential next president of a foreign country located thousands of miles away from Britain is "extremely" pro-friendly towards another foreign country located on the other side of the planet from Britain. In other words, how "extremely dangerous" it is that U.S.-Occupied Korea is trying to jump off the NATO-led war wagon and instead build better relations with its actual neighbours in Asia.
South Korea's Western-hijacked MSM 'newspaper of record', The Chosun Daily (Chosun Ilbo), also fearmongered about this potential moderate turn for the country as "sparking concern".
Luke de Pulford is a member of the UK Tory party's 'Human Rights' Commission and the founder and executive director of IPAC (Inter-Parliamentary Alliance against on China), an international, cross-party alliance of parliamentarians from 'democratic' countries focused on browbeating and demonising China.
IPAC is reportedly financed by the Open Society Foundations of George Soros, the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), which is funded by the U.S. gov't, and by the Taiwan Foundation for Democracy.
It's ironic that Sorosite hawks like de Pulford try to fearmonger about South Korea potentially taking a moderate position on the "One China Principle", when Pulford's sponsor, the U.S. gov't, itself signed off on the "One China Principle" in official joint documented agreements in the 1970s. The 1972 joint statement says that the U.S. "acknowledges that [...] there is but one China and that Taiwan is a part of China" and "does not challenge that position". But of course NATO's war hawks pretend to have selective amnesia about those agreements (which are still current and were never officially revoked).
Russia are smarter by world standards but this thing will have involvement of Gulf Arabs and Jews together once these get involved things become so complex. almost need Doctor of Sciences to understand it.
Lavrov is the last person to ask this thing. I am not sure why Tucker choose interview him. Those related to Georgia/Armenia simply cannot understand 21st century.
I only showed you Saudi-US history. there is another history of Arabs and Europe. US decline started in 1960s due to rise of Europe and since US simply unwilling or unable to reverse this trend. This New Europe is MBS response. This 2018 clip of MBS about New Europe replayed 5 years later by Russian Z channel that this important to track. Just before this Ukraine operation. A reporter was stand up to Putin to remind whole Russia that there is a History and there is special relations. smart people can understand what they were referring too and it keep repeating in everything.
It is non interference because it's concerns where China's domestic products and tech ends up. Granted since China is ~30% of the global economy, in practice anything going on the global economy is also domestic Chinese affairs. It's probably expected that China will keep non interference propaganda line forever, while continuing to affect global politics into the correct direction.
Once US realizes "one China" is a sham to get time to prepare defenses, US will revoke it and it will mark the beginning of US offensive on Taiwan. But it's far too late for them now, the inflection point has long passed. All it will do is give China legitimacy to storm US occupied territory in Asia and form a buffer zone.
plawolf
Lieutenant General
Go on! Boost that defence spending to double digits of total U.S. GDP and speed run the USSR collapse!