It was Saudi King discussing Jewish state with US president. UK was non entity. and even American let be known that Saudi displeasure.UK could still eat India. But if you said the US alone, I would let it go. You included the Saudis and it because ridiculous. The UK takes orders from America but it does not from the Saudis. This is real history; your version where the Saudis are the decision makers is not supported by any history.
Communist Soviet name is there in aggression against Muslim lands (Plural). what is missing?. and Saudi have interest in Indian Subcontinent shown by the two King Sons visit to India in 1940 to support division of India. Soft Power is Arab while Hard Power is American.
However, King Saud and Churchill didn’t share the same amiable meeting that Saud had experienced with President Roosevelt. The British attempted to outshine the Americans with a larger ship and a grander display, which Saud apparently found “dull” and off-putting.4 He preferred the more engaging and intimate atmosphere provided by his American hosts and President Roosevelt. King Saud,
The U.S. and Saudi Arabia: A 21st-century partnership
Indeed, it was the Saudi-U.S. alliance that helped end Soviet aggression against Muslim lands, and liberated Kuwait from Iraqi occupation. Even when differences emerged (and serious ones did emerge on numerous ), the Americans have found their Saudi allies reasonable, calm and open to practical solution.