Miscellaneous News

I

Index

Senior Member
Registered Member
tabu said:
Be careful. Your enemies are ready to hit China's cities and especially the Three Gorges, after which China will be up to war.
Click to expand...
We'll do more than hit your cities in return. Mariupol and Gaza will seem as Shanghai and Macau in comparison to what will happen to hostile cities.

Send just 1 shitty subsonic cruise missile towards the smallest village sewer dam on the mainland and you'll get to see what a cluster drone munition dropped into a busy street looks like. And then see it over and over again for as many times as the megafactories on the mainland can pump munitions out, or your aggressor country runs out of people to hit...

Israel should stay put and not abet US aggression in any shape or form. That way, they ensure the survival of their people. China can knock out Israel's power in a week with conventional air/artillery assets from Xinjiang.
 
T

tokenanalyst

Brigadier
Registered Member
tabu said:
Be careful. Your enemies are ready to hit China's cities and especially the Three Gorges, after which China will be up to war.
Click to expand...
People are underestimating what it takes to destroy a dam that size except nuclear weapons and that means nuclear war. And even in the hypothetical case that someone can cause mass causalities hitting that dam will only open that door for China to cause mass causalities to anyone who hit that dam.
 
I

Index

Senior Member
Registered Member
tokenanalyst said:
People are underestimating what it takes to destroy a dam that size except nuclear weapons and that means nuclear war. And even in the hypothetical case that someone can cause mass causalities hitting that dam will only open that door for China to cause mass causalities to anyone who hit that dam.
Click to expand...
Firing a lot of missiles over/at the mainland at assumed civilian targets, even if they're all likely to be shot down, fulfils the clause of planning/actualizing a mass attack on civilians in China by a state actor, which legally allows PLA to deliver WMD strategic 2nd strike.

Ofc China wouldn't use WMD, they'd just deliver 100s of kilotons in conventional weapons into the cities that launched the missiles. Same effect with no nuclear controversy.

The key here is that China can (after an intentional mass attack on civilians on the mainland) reply with strategic strikes meaning strikes not against military target but for the purpose of totally neutralizing enemy strategic combat capability.
 
T

tokenanalyst

Brigadier
Registered Member
The thing that really angers is that is quite easy to keep peace and prosperity Across the Straight and the Pacific in general. Keep the One China Policy, the status quo and tell those useful idiots in that island to shut the f*ck up. That island will get to enjoy their semiconductor industry, their high standard of living and their shit*y elections. A prosperous Taiwan is more useful to China than a pile of ruble. But not, a group of useful idiots in that island are willing to trade decades of prosperity for years of absolute misery to satisfy a group of clowns in the US that once they have stripped that Island of their best talent and more valuable companies, they are going to forget that Island even existed.
 
I

Index

Senior Member
Registered Member
tokenanalyst said:
The thing that really angers is that is quite easy to keep peace and prosperity Across the Straight and the Pacific in general. Keep the One China Policy, the status quo and tell those useful idiots in that island to shut the f*ck up. That island will get to enjoy their semiconductor industry, their high standard of living and their shit*y elections. A prosperous Taiwan is more useful to China than a pile of ruble.
Click to expand...
That is a revanchist American lie. "Peace and prosperity" inside China can only be defined by the Chinese people. We owe no accommodations to terrorists and other armed troublemakers.

The prosperity a province should have is dictated by the needs of the whole country and it's contribution to those. If Taiwan's only contribution is insurgents, criminals and Wang jingwei adherents while not giving a cent to central government proceeds or helping the reconstruction of the country in any way, it is worth less than a pile of rubble and a parking lot over the whole province would be preferable over the status quo.

This so called "one China" is a grave insult, it's something we were forced to sign only to remove the risks of MAD and to buy time to build up the military. It's for us what the Minsk agreements were for Ukraine. If you read up on what it means, you'll realize why we must break it as soon as possible.
 
Bellum_Romanum

Bellum_Romanum

Brigadier
Registered Member
Index said:
Firing a lot of missiles over/at the mainland at assumed civilian targets, even if they're all likely to be shot down, fulfils the clause of planning/actualizing a mass attack on civilians in China by a state actor, which legally allows PLA to deliver WMD strategic 2nd strike.

Ofc China wouldn't use WMD, they'd just deliver 100s of kilotons in conventional weapons into the cities that launched the missiles. Same effect with no nuclear controversy.

The key here is that China can (after an intentional mass attack on civilians on the mainland) reply with strategic strikes meaning strikes not against military target but for the purpose of totally neutralizing enemy strategic combat capability.
Click to expand...
We have not clearly done our homework about the real capabilities of the PLA. I think we all may have been misled and forget that the PLA have no faced or experience joint maneuver warfare and all of its supposed self-advertised capabilities are nothing but mere facade.

That's according the world's foremost PLA military analyst link below. Watch and weep commies!!

 
B

BlackWindMnt

Captain
Registered Member
Sardaukar20 said:
So much Jai Hind jealousy. Russia's most important friend is China, not India. No amount of ranting and copium is gonna change that.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Moscow doesn't need anyone to counterbalance Beijing. Both have earned their mutual trust. If your ultimate aim is to separate Beijing and Moscow, then you're taking Russia as a pawn, not a true friend. You Jai Hinds demand that Russia should give your Supapowar India exclusive loyalty. Yet you Jai Hinds two-time with the West. Lol, you loincloth imperialists!


Russia is treating you like how Russia treats its other "normal friends". Supapowar India is not Russia's bro. China is. Modi's hugs are not exclusive to Putin only, so that does not count as "special treatment". Putin is not flipping pancakes with Modi, or had gifted him ice cream. So, both of them are still not bros.


Lol! What have India done to bring Moscow and Kiev to the negotiating table? G20? Modi hugging Zelensky? What has been achieved so far? Nothing!


WTF? LoL! India had been doing the exact opposite of this mantra. Proclaiming Supapowardom, Akhand Bharat, loincloth imperialism, overseas assassination, boasting about nuking a NATO member, Brahmin genetics, the list goes on. India is already talking about taking over the world when it is still behind Germany in economics, and has a military that could not intimidate Pakistan.
Click to expand...
There's isn't a "leaked" clip of Modi and Putin like you had with Xi and Putin saying they are in the driver seat of geopolitical events happening once every couple of centuries. Plotting together to take over the world, If that isn't real bromance than i don't know what is.
 
Bellum_Romanum

Bellum_Romanum

Brigadier
Registered Member
Oh oh Canada's master is not going to be happy about them "Indigenous folks" for trying to make deals with the commies of China (their forefathers) despite the security concerns and warning from the not so compromised and U.S. intelligence infested CSIS.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Canada’s indigenous communities are seeking deals with China that could give Beijing access to the country’s natural resources, despite warnings from Canadian security services over doing business with Xi Jinping’s government.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top