Lol, censorship of by deleting a thread with more than different 30 replies

[Blitzo]

To be honest Tidalwave, that thread was an appropriate deletion. I was not the one who deleted it but it was more appropriate in other threads. The form of commentary you provided was also not in line with the standards we expect here.

 

[Deino]

Normally thread with such number of replies would get locked if being objected by mod but instead deleting in a secretive way. Agenda abound. The real world is very different.

And any normal forum member would have known that the thread you started was a purely political one and even more - esp in mind of it's questionable "source" - a highly controversial one. Everyone would have known that such threads are forbidden and when you either cannot hold yourself back in discussing such topics or simply cannot obey to a given rule, you should better enjoy your one month vacation or look for another forum.

In all clearness: I clearly explained my decision to forbid political and especially such politically controversial threads and everyone who cannot accept this but even more cries out against an "unfair childish moderator", who as either a "bigot and racist" would misuse his moderator's force only to execute censorship is wrong here at the SDF.

 

[SpicySichuan]

I suggest the moderators permit a specific thread dedicated to civilized political debates. Topics include Taiwan's contested sovereignty, U.S.-China Trade Relationship, South China Sea, historical grievances, Chinese political identities, etc. There should be no foul words or personal attacks allowed.

 

[Hyperwarp]

Why not create a new subforum for Strategic political, geopolitical, economics, etc matters? A subforum separate from the "China Defense & Military" subsection? Then the "dollar system thread" could be moved there. That thread by Tidalwave was about a very strategic matter but not strictly military.

Keep the "Strategic Defence" purely of military matters such as Ballistic missiles, long-range cruise missiles, cyber warfare, Espionage, overseas military bases, Exports, etc

Just my 2-cent

 

[Jura The idiot]

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

A military exhibit in Yinchuan recently received a J-10S as a new exhibit. This goes to show that twin-seaters were heavily used due to a low number of advanced trainers in the early 2000s.

The original question did not ask about the feasibility of entire squads being equipped with QTS-11.

The original question only asked about whether an entire squad that was hypothetically all equipped with QTS-11 might fire their grenades in a volley.


If anyone here is moving the goalposts or misinterpreting the question here, it is you.

Generally spoken, Yes, but IMO these are only two more regular Y-20As but anyway I cannot wait to see it.

would you please reopen
China's SCS Strategy Thread https://www.sinodefenceforum.com/chinas-scs-strategy-thread.t3118/

because of for instance
Manila asks China to explain warships in PI waters

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

thank you for consideration