manqiangrexue
Brigadier
Obviously because Indians all ran like cowards and needed to be let off the hook so China can attend to more urgent, more American matters.You should be asking yourself why China failed to secure its 1959 claim line in Galwan, and kick Indian soldiers out of the valley.
Not at all, it is because of India's cowardly ambush that required a response and a lesson from China.Isn't that why China violated the previously undisputed LAC?
Media rife with liars means freedom of speech? LOLOL This is exactly what I mean by Indians spinning everything into a positive for themselves to declare goals met.2. As for why media is allowed to "lie," that is how freedom of speech works. That is also why idiots like Ajai Shukla make up bs like 1000lm of land lost(which is hilariously quoted here) even though satellite imagery clearly disproves that.
Reality is not kind to Indians. Lost every engagement in a new humiliating way but have to spin them all into victories.Reality is not so kind to your delusions.
Do you have any evidence for your claims? Because international media sources and satellite images are debunking your claims. But listne to idot conspiracy theorists like Pravin Sawhney to make you feel better.
Yup, first, you got the word right this time. "Give" India, because India cannot force/enforce, earn, or take anything. Secondly, that's exactly what India wanted in retrospect after analyzing what it might still salvage from its losses. That's the strategic interest that was preserved; it was never the initial intention of those who started this with the cowardly ambush.As I have said, the depsang claims and claims of India retreating from finger 8(lol) are ways for some nationalists here to cope with the reality of CHina retreating and giving India exactly what it had wanted.
Last edited: