The other thing I'd point out is that when I talk about Brahmin dominance (i.e, all the bleeding educated Indians you meet overseas are Brahmins, all the good jobs in India are taken by Brahmins, and so on) you have to remember that Brahmins make up only about 5% of the Hindu population. They are an aristocracy that holds privilege.
I am anti-Brahmanical (i.e, against the caste system and its continuing influence in India life), but a transition to a casteless society may require the ascendancy of different classes. A Shudra-domination, for instance, would effectively be the negation of the caste system as within the traditional schema of Varnas, they are the lowest of the casted. But a Shudra-domination, given their lack of privilege is unfeasible, so the best practical option is for a Kshatriya-Shudra alliance to overturn the last vestiges of the caste system.
I am anti-Brahmanical (i.e, against the caste system and its continuing influence in India life), but a transition to a casteless society may require the ascendancy of different classes. A Shudra-domination, for instance, would effectively be the negation of the caste system as within the traditional schema of Varnas, they are the lowest of the casted. But a Shudra-domination, given their lack of privilege is unfeasible, so the best practical option is for a Kshatriya-Shudra alliance to overturn the last vestiges of the caste system.
FRAYER: Mauktik grew up in a Brahmin family in India. Brahmins were the Hindu priests. They were long considered the most pure. Mauktik's family had separate kitchen utensils for other castes who might visit. And despite affirmative action to elevate oppressed castes, Brahmins still wield disproportionate wealth and power. They're an elite minority in India, but you might be surprised at how many Indian Americans are Brahmins - Silicon Valley CEOs, celebrities and politicians.
Last edited: