Not to rule out that the JMSDF won't develop their 20k tonners along similar lines, but that's the San Antonio-derived arsenal ship concept from HII, back in 2017 -Uhhhhh, looks like an ugly LPD
Not to rule out that the JMSDF won't develop their 20k tonners along similar lines, but that's the San Antonio-derived arsenal ship concept from HII, back in 2017 -Uhhhhh, looks like an ugly LPD
I mean the record for staying the longest underwater by a conventional submarine was done by the small German U212A with its innovative fuel cells powered AIP. Batteries give you the option to dash if necessary but nothing beats the endurance of a modern AIP system.
Well increased battery capacity should also give similar effect. particularly if Li-ion battery do live its hype.
Just look at what happened to the Losharik (the parasite sub on the Belgorod if I'm correct).Unless they're using lithium iron phosphate, I truly pity any stupid bastards that want to put any significant quantity of lithium ion batteries in submarines...it's just asking for trouble.
Unless they're using lithium iron phosphate, I truly pity any stupid bastards that want to put any significant quantity of lithium ion batteries in submarines...it's just asking for trouble.
Just look at what happened to the Losharik (the parasite sub on the Belgorod if I'm correct).
As far as I know the fire originated from the lithium-ion battery pack. Please correct me if I'm wrong.Well 20-25% of surface displacement of a conventional submarine is Battery so the Japanese's sub has over 700 metric tonne of Li-Ion battery inside.
Is this really the battery's vault ?
As far as I know the fire originated from the lithium-ion battery pack. Please correct me if I'm wrong.