J-XY/J-35 carrier-borne fighter thread

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
I don't quite understand why it has a canopy like F-35B which would impact the aft view seriously.

Increased volume to accommodate increased fuel/repositioning of avionics seems like a plausible reason to me.

With the way that air combat is going, a direct rearward view by turning one's head using mk 1 eyeballs is probably not quite as important as it once was.
 

anzha

Senior Member
Registered Member
With the way that air combat is going, a direct rearward view by turning one's head using mk 1 eyeballs is probably not quite as important as it once was.

Don't DAS like systems make it less than necessary to have true line of sight?
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Don't DAS like systems make it less than necessary to have true line of sight?

To an extent, but I don't really want to go into the details of future air combat in this thread.

But in general, the ability to physically turn one's head backwards to look back with your own biological eyeballs is not that important these days, nor going forwards.
 

Hadoren

Junior Member
Registered Member
So how many years are expected until low rate initial production (LRIP)? And how many would be produced yearly under LRIP?
  • 2-3 years until LRIP?
  • 5-10 planes/year under LRIP?
Starting in 2024, should we expect 5-10 jets being produced annually?
 

Arienai

New Member
Registered Member
People on Weibo posted this paper which was published several month ago.

It seems the new cockpit shape can help decrease transonic drag.
 

Attachments

  • 6fgbrjzkki5gexezochpbhia1.jpg
    6fgbrjzkki5gexezochpbhia1.jpg
    75.4 KB · Views: 130
  • 6be8r8rjgjf2rvtxcrbvh3ce5.jpg
    6be8r8rjgjf2rvtxcrbvh3ce5.jpg
    236.8 KB · Views: 128
Last edited:
Top