It is, look carefully. What appears to be screen split at a first glance is(most likely) flight data window on the screen itself.J-35 is supposed to have a single screen touchscreen. This picture doesn't seem like that
It is, look carefully. What appears to be screen split at a first glance is(most likely) flight data window on the screen itself.J-35 is supposed to have a single screen touchscreen. This picture doesn't seem like that
The aux inlet is on the port side which is the naval variant.Not quite sure of the variant, so i'll put it here. Could be naval though.
View attachment 160401
You know that F-35 attracts more lighting (lighting attracts lightingOr you know, use radomes with no diverter strips like the F-35... not sure why they are not using that
Although it has been answered by others that it is J-35. It will help in the future to remember a distiction in this photo that tells who is whom. F-35's aft edge of cockpit suck into the fuselage, while J-35's aft edge sits on the fuselage.Is this J-35? It doesn't seem like it
As I have repeatedly said J-35 and J-35A are rushed for the parade. There are lots of production details that are not ironed out, typical of LRIP products. In SW world it is similar to release candidates which are stable and functioning to the specification except some minor roughness.View attachment 160435
These LRIP batch J-35s need to lift their detail work to J-20's level. Look at the alignment of these radome discharge strips and where the canopy meets the perimeter. The other bits are from stealth tape to seal off the fuel probe compartment.
Overall the finish is pretty superb. Just not J-20 or F-35 level.
Compare to J-20.
View attachment 160437
Everywhere else it's meeting the standard, especially fuselage sections and gaps but the J-20's canopy looks better made. Even the discharge strips on a J-10 radome is perfectly made. Same goes for J-16 and J-15 series so it's not a SAC manufacturing issue. Might just be effect of new production lines getting into the groove.
I was asking because it seems like the cockpit screen is not a uniform center touchscreen. It looks like the 3 screen design similar to j-10.Although it has been answered by others that it is J-35. It will help in the future to remember a distiction in this photo that tells who is whom. F-35's aft edge of cockpit suck into the fuselage, while J-35's aft edge sits on the fuselage.
Damn....the J35 is so beautiful and well made so much that it now makes the J20 look outdated. SAC did a great job here. Just my opinion though. Lol.You are correct and I wanted to deleted my post just after posting but unfortunately it didn't work!
But yes, these are clearly the naval J-35!
View attachment 160420
Looking at a few latest photo of various different aircraft, I am beginning to believe that PLAN has indeed changed its paint scheme for landing gear wheel of in-service aircraft from green to white paint. Will keep on the observation to be sure.Unless PLAN has changed its paint scheme for the landing gear wheels from green to white paint, I think these three J35 that participated in the Sept 3rd parade are not in official regular service yet, or were never meant to be, if they are prototypes.
View attachment 160505
I disagree. The recent photos by wanquan of the J-15T/DH/DT family (posted over on the J-15 thread) all show them with the signature green wheels. That being said, I don't think the colors of the wheels are an indicator of whether it's meant to be in frontline service; the earlier J-15T prototypes with just the gear modified also had green wheels, and the J-15T we saw at Zhuhai (which was also a later prototype judging from the 4 digit number on the front fuselage) was also equipped with green wheels.Looking at a few latest photo of various different aircraft, I am beginning to believe that PLAN has indeed changed its paint scheme for landing gear wheel of in-service aircraft from green to white paint. Will keep on the observation to be sure.