That’s FC-31 2.0 though, just with folded wings.
It’s clearly marked as J35 though.That’s FC-31 2.0 though, just with folded wings.
Yeah but the fuselage, especially the cockpit region is quite obviously the same as the fc-31 2.0 Guess they reused the fuselage, made new wings, painted the whole thing green and called it a day.It’s clearly marked as J35 though.
It’s clearly marked as J35 though.
But folded wing is a much more obvious difference from fc31 2.0.Yeah but the fuselage, especially the cockpit region is quite obviously the same as the fc-31 2.0 Guess they reused the fuselage, made new wings, painted the whole thing green and called it a day.
Ha, good one. But the comparison is a bit stretched. That J35 model is given out by the manufacturer, not by some random exhibitions. Although the model is not accurate, it does present one of the major differences between J35 and fc31 2.0: folded wing.
Excuse me but I don’t really see your point here. That model, while labeled J-35 as you pointed out, has the same fuselage as a fc31 2.0, and is clearly different in that regard than the real J-35. Most likely the manufacturer decided to reuse at least part of the fuselage from previous models and changed the wings and paint to make it look more or less like the J-35.But folded wing is a much more obvious difference from fc31 2.0.
My point is that the model is closer to J35 than to FC31 2.0, because it has folded wings and it has the J35 label by the manufacturer. It’s just that simple and clear.Excuse me but I don’t really see your point here. That model, while labeled J-35 as you pointed out, has the same fuselage as a fc31 2.0, and is clearly different in that regard than the real J-35. Most likely the manufacturer decided to reuse at least part of the fuselage from previous models and changed the wings and paint to make it look more or less like the J-35.
It’s not that big of a deal anyway and I don’t really care at this point. You’re right in saying that it’s closer to the J-35, and Siegecrossbow is right in saying its fuselage is identical to the fc-31 ver 2.0 so everybody is right it’s just a matter of perspectiveMy point is that the model is closer to J35 than to FC31 2.0, because it has folded wings and it has the J35 label by the manufacturer. It’s just that simple and clear.
whether the model is accurate or not is a trivial matter.
Sorry to reply on this just one last time. You forget the most important perspective: the manufacturer calls this model J35.It’s not that big of a deal anyway and I don’t really care at this point. You’re right in saying that it’s closer to the J-35, and Siegecrossbow is right in saying its fuselage is identical to the fc-31 ver 2.0 so everybody is right it’s just a matter of perspective