Re: New Generation Fighter
Doesnt matter, from a manufactering capacity point of view, China now has full capability to has a healthy competion with US in the military industry sector, actually some arm race is good for China's current economy since the capacity is already there, what they lacks is the experiences in the high-end, and in a system such as China, the quickest way to gain experiences in high-end manufacturing is through some major projects in military industry or space industry sectors (Not to confusing with Soviet union, first the industry capacity of China now is several times more than Soviet at its peak time, and percentage-wise China spent far less in military sector comparing to Soviet Union (1/5 to 1/10 depend on sources), also China has a free market such that civil sector can benefit from the advancement of military research).
If it were not the space race which trained lots experienced scientists and engineers, the US would not have been lead the world in techs so much in the first place.
As for nozzle, I think all rumors suggest they will go some 360 degree vector nozzle like the Russia, that's first because it is easier to design such nozzle comparing the one installed on F-22, the second reason is they are better at dog-fight.
If that is true, then I must say it is good news... and potentially bad.
If China does show off it's 4th gen fighter in the next few years and Obama hasn't killed off the F-22 programme enough, then the PLAAF may have to contend with increased numbers of F-22s... D=
There was a recent article floating on the net in which an F-22 pilot from Middle East training said 5th gen fighters from China may prompt the US to re start the F-22... Sorry guys for restarting this part again, but if the F-22 does get into over 187 numbers then the PLAAF is pretty screwed.
70092, dude do you (or anyone else) happen to have any information about the engine nozzles on the J-XX/WS-15? I'm just thinking that if the nozzles are serrated, flat and have edge alignment like the F-22's, then it would mean the rest of the aircraft's details are probably quite good as well (and we all know detail must be paid attention to for stealth if western circles are to be believed).
(And also, a noob question - what exactly is a ground test? Is it the same as a static test like shaking an aircraft apart to see how long it lasts before it collapses?)
Please and thank you!
Doesnt matter, from a manufactering capacity point of view, China now has full capability to has a healthy competion with US in the military industry sector, actually some arm race is good for China's current economy since the capacity is already there, what they lacks is the experiences in the high-end, and in a system such as China, the quickest way to gain experiences in high-end manufacturing is through some major projects in military industry or space industry sectors (Not to confusing with Soviet union, first the industry capacity of China now is several times more than Soviet at its peak time, and percentage-wise China spent far less in military sector comparing to Soviet Union (1/5 to 1/10 depend on sources), also China has a free market such that civil sector can benefit from the advancement of military research).
If it were not the space race which trained lots experienced scientists and engineers, the US would not have been lead the world in techs so much in the first place.
As for nozzle, I think all rumors suggest they will go some 360 degree vector nozzle like the Russia, that's first because it is easier to design such nozzle comparing the one installed on F-22, the second reason is they are better at dog-fight.