J-20... The New Generation Fighter III

Status
Not open for further replies.

latenlazy

Brigadier
Never accused DoD of misreporting J-20.
Though I wonder why they call J-10 and J-11 by F-10 and F-11. By that logic J-20 should = F-20

Also, note they called the JH-7 FB-7. They're probably translating the J to F to stand for fighter in order to clarify their roles. My guess is they left J-20 the way it is because they haven't gotten an official designation from China yet, and it is commonly known as the J-20 in the media. Keep in mind the DoD's audience (mainly Congressman).
 

Quickie

Colonel
To summarize, Dr. Song started out with a wing that has low drag at supersonic speed but performs poorly at subsonic speed/high AoA, and augmented the heck out of it with lift. The first obvious feature is LEX, then comes canards, and finally lift from body. In the end, through the interaction between LEX and canards, he was able to get even more lift by reducing* the wing's aspect-ratio, even though the conventional wisdom is that the larger aspect-ratio the better. The presence of LEX enables the canards to be placed far from the wings yet provide similar lift enhancement as close-couple canards. Canard configuration is also chosen because in the absence of TVC, canards provide total pitch authority at maximum AoA whereas elevators cannot.

*Obviously, the J-20 is an unconvential design, and cannot only be analyzed with classical aerodynamic theories.

Looks like those people are not able to see pass the more conventional aerodynamics design they're so used to, to come to understand the more unconventional methods of achieving aircraft design requirement as proposed in Dr Song's paper.

My opinion is that the use of canards in the J-20 design, or any other jetfighter, already points to a maneuverablity requirement. The thing is, if the intended design is that of a striker jetfighter, the use of the canards would already be out of the question. There has never been a dedicated canard striker/bomber jetfighter and the J-20 designer would certainly not make an exception as if designing a stealth figher is not already complicated enough.
 

Quickie

Colonel
.....If China was willing to trade maneuverability for weight then the obvious choice would be implementing larger vertical stabilizors instead of risking all moving ones.

In addition, if it wasn't for maneuverbility, the stabilizers wouldn't be vertically and horizontally canted at such a high degree and placed so far aft. And then, there's the decision to use the canards instead of horizontal stabilizers which I've commented on in the earlier post.
 

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Two more flights today. THis makes it... I don't know... These flights are significant, however, since the J-20 and the JF-17 performed aerobatic maneuvers for Xi Jinping! Here are the pictures.


HPsA4.jpg


VXLzc.jpg


bUJoD.jpg


mRi8K.jpg


UKHjJ.jpg


Can't wait till the videos come out!
 
Last edited:

starikki

New Member
Looks like those people are not able to see pass the more conventional aerodynamics design they're so used to, to come to understand the more unconventional methods of achieving aircraft design requirement as proposed in Dr Song's paper.

My opinion is that the use of canards in the J-20 design, or any other jetfighter, already points to a maneuverablity requirement. The thing is, if the intended design is that of a striker jetfighter, the use of the canards would already be out of the question. There has never been a dedicated canard striker/bomber jetfighter and the J-20 designer would certainly not make an exception as if designing a stealth figher is not already complicated enough.

+1
Well if you see the abstract of Dr. Song's paper, It said absolutely nothing about creating a striker :p
 

Deino

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
I want that one laaaaaaaarge !
 

Attachments

  • J-20 - 26.8.11 - flights 36 + 37 - 14 + open side bay.jpg
    J-20 - 26.8.11 - flights 36 + 37 - 14 + open side bay.jpg
    52 KB · Views: 73

Deino

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Two more flights today. THis makes it... I don't know... These flights are significant, however, since the J-20 and the JF-17 performed aerobatic maneuvers for Xi Jinping! Here are the pictures.

Xi Jinping ... is it correct, the current Vice-Chairman of the Central Military Commission and the PRC's Vice President ! ... I somewhere read that he is assigned to become Chairman of the CMC at around 2012/13 (or in other posts that he Xi would succeed Hu Jintao as Secretary and President in 2012) ; any idea, what is that correct ?

Deino
 
Last edited:

Lion

Senior Member
The presence of LEX enables the canards to be placed far from the wings yet provide similar lift enhancement as close-couple canards. Canard configuration is also chosen because in the absence of TVC, canards provide total pitch authority at maximum AoA whereas elevators cannot.

*Obviously, the J-20 is an unconvential design, and cannot only be analyzed with classical aerodynamic theories.

So more or less it confirms J-20 will have a conventional engine and no TVC.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top