that depends on the mission profiles ws10 equipped for endurance while ws15 equipped for high intensity missions.I don't see why there would be any reason to continue producing an inferior model once WS-15 enters service.
that depends on the mission profiles ws10 equipped for endurance while ws15 equipped for high intensity missions.I don't see why there would be any reason to continue producing an inferior model once WS-15 enters service.
I don't see why there would be any reason to continue producing an inferior model once WS-15 enters service.
Edit: 'Twas a mere jokeAccording to Orca entering service by 2025. There is also a meme in the military watch circles that J-20 production line is shutting down — to be superceded by J-20A production.
oh well m itching for the video...
There was a landing video yesterday for existing about 2 hours before taken down and it had a much clearer view on the engine, sadly it disappeared at the moment I was trying to download it.Which video? The one where these two stills are from is here:
There was a landing video yesterday for existing about 2 hours before taken down and it had a much clearer view on the engine, sadly it disappeared at the moment I was trying to download it.
I don't think they are directly comparable. And I think it's a common misunderstanding to say F135 is better than F119. F135 has a BPR of 0.57, while F119 is 0.3, of course it is easier for F135 to have larger Thrust and Thrust-to-weight ratio.I always felt it was reasonable to expect WS-15 to sit somewhere between F135 and F119 (purely in terms of thrust) considering advances in technology since F119 and continued improvements to WS-10. But these thrust numbers put WS-15 solidly in the F135 class. Maybe someone with better knowledge can correct me.