J-20 5th Gen Fighter Thread VIII

00CuriousObserver

Senior Member
Registered Member
Not that I'm explicitly challenging the authenticity of this (as timing of the release of such imagery and the quality of this imagery are reasonable), but who was the original poster of this?

It probably circulated via 牧星观海天; there is a gif of it. I suspect it came from a recently released video somewhere, but I haven't seen anyone link the particular video.

Via 052D成都舰: The vertical tail hasn’t had its corners clipped, the insignia sits higher up, the exhaust/nozzle is painted white, there’s a number on the nose, and there’s a pitot tube on the tip—this is an ancient clip of prototype No. 2002 doing bomb-release testing.

 

learner123

Just Hatched
Registered Member
Not sure if this has been answered before, but why didnt the j20 use ws 10 engines right from the start as an intermediary instead of the al 31? I understand that the ws-10a is similar in dimensions to the al-31?
 

bsdnf

Senior Member
Registered Member
Not sure if this has been answered before, but why didnt the j20 use ws 10 engines right from the start as an intermediary instead of the al 31? I understand that the ws-10a is similar in dimensions to the al-31?
WS-10A completed its design finalization tests in the second quarter of 2009 and its production finalization tests in the fourth quarter of 2010, while the J-20 demonstrator made its maiden flight in 2011. Just like the J-36-01 likely still using the WS-10C, there simply wasn't enough time.
 

latenlazy

Brigadier
WS-10A completed its design finalization tests in the second quarter of 2009 and its production finalization tests in the fourth quarter of 2010, while the J-20 demonstrator made its maiden flight in 2011. Just like the J-36-01 likely still using the WS-10C, there simply wasn't enough time.
The WS-10 had serious teething issues going into the mid 2010s, and wasn’t really a fully reliable product until the late 2010s.
 

learner123

Just Hatched
Registered Member
WS-10A completed its design finalization tests in the second quarter of 2009 and its production finalization tests in the fourth quarter of 2010, while the J-20 demonstrator made its maiden flight in 2011. Just like the J-36-01 likely still using the WS-10C, there simply wasn't enough time.
I am referring to the first 2 LRIP batches of J-20s produced 2016-2018, using russian Al31FM2 engines, when the j-16 also a twin engined fighter, at that point in time had been produced for 4 batches with WS-10b engines.
The WS-10 had serious teething issues going into the mid 2010s, and wasn’t really a fully reliable product until the late 2010s.
So to draw a conclusion, later variants of the al31s were more reliable then the initial ws-10b on the frist few batches of the j-16? or were there other reasons as to why the first two batche of j-20s were produced with russian engines?
 

plawolf

Lieutenant General
I am referring to the first 2 LRIP batches of J-20s produced 2016-2018, using russian Al31FM2 engines, when the j-16 also a twin engined fighter, at that point in time had been produced for 4 batches with WS-10b engines.

So to draw a conclusion, later variants of the al31s were more reliable than the initial ws-10b on the frist few batches of the j-16? or were there other reasons as to why the first two batche of j-20s were produced with russian engines?

You do realise you can’t just swop engines like you change underpants right?

It takes a lot of time to redesign the airframe to take a new engine, even when provisions were originally made in the base design. Once you have installed the new engines you need to re-do a lot of the test flights for evaluation and validation. All of that can take years.

When you put a fighter into LRIP, the base design would need to be frozen, with the focus on quality control and production ramp up.
 
Top