J-20 5th Gen Fighter Thread VIII

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

1. Criticized wall climbers for sharing photos with the likes of @Deino. They might get arrested if authorities take it seriously.
2. There is a limit to how old a J-20 pilot can be. A lot of brigades keep older type because older pilots will retire without flying J-20.
3. A lot of J-20 pilots are Beijing University or Tsinhua Univerisity graduates. They bring special skills or acumen to the post and rapidly adjust to life in the military.
 

ACuriousPLAFan

Brigadier
Registered Member
This:
2. There is a limit to how old a J-20 pilot can be. A lot of brigades keep older type because older pilots will retire without flying J-20.
And
3. A lot of J-20 pilots are Beijing University or Tsinghua University graduates. They bring special skills or acumen to the post and rapidly adjust to life in the military.

From the surface, it does seem like a bit of a waste, considering how older fighter pilots would have more experiences than younger ones.

However, given how youngsters today typically have better knowledge and understanding at using all sorts of modern gadgets (e.g. smartphones and computers) than their parents - The same can be said with all the new technologies, skillsets and methods of conducting aerial warfare that are typically better mastered by younger pilots compared to older pilots. All the new kinds of skills and knowledge that are always evolving and upgrading are much easier to be picked up by the youngsters compared to the elders too.

It is indeed true that we are gradually living in a new world where "higher age = better" no longer applies as much as before.

In the meantime, while retaining the older fighter pilots to keep flying older fighter types until retirement is one way to go with - I'd prefer more if these older pilots can be relegated/retrained to fly airlifters, tankers and special mission aircrafts. Flying these "heavies" frequently entails longer flight hours, but less physically and mentally taxing to the (aging) bodies of military pilots compared to flying highly-agile fighters. This should guarantee that while older pilots can continue serving with the PLAAF until retirement, the fighter fleets of the PLAAF can be upgraded and expanded faster and across-the-board as well.
 
Last edited:

Maikeru

Major
Registered Member
This:

And


It does seem like a bit of a waste, considering how older fighter pilots would have more experiences than younger ones.

However, given how youngsters today typically have better knowledge and understanding at using all sorts of modern gadgets (e.g. smartphones and computers) than their parents - The same can be said with all the new technologies, skillsets and methods of conducting aerial warfare that are typically better mastered by younger pilots compared to older pilots. All the new kinds of skills and knowledge that are always evolving and upgrading are much easier to be picked up by the youngsters compared to the elders too.

It is indeed true that we are gradually living in a new world where "higher age = better" no longer applies as much as before.

In the meantime, while retaining the older fighter pilots to keep flying older fighter types until retirement is one way to go with - I'd prefer more if these older pilots can be relegated/retrained to fly airlifters, tankers and special mission aircrafts. Flying these "heavies" frequently entails longer flight hours, but less physically and mentally taxing to the (aging) bodies of military pilots compared to flying highly-agile fighters. This should guarantee that while older pilots can continue serving with the PLAAF until retirement, the fighter fleets of the PLAAF can be upgraded and expanded faster and across-the-board as well.
In western air forces the older pilots often transition to UAV 'pilots' I think. Could be same for PLAAF.
 
Top