J-20 5th Gen Fighter Thread V

[SinoSoldier]

It wasn't different angles, it was different lighting Do some repeat watching

You are right; the two-face girlfriend was mainly due to the lighting. Kind of like the Batman villain.

 

[delft]

Because of the high humidity at Chengdu the vortices when an aircraft flies at a high angle of attack are beautifully shown.

 

[Equation]

Because of the high humidity at Chengdu the vortices when an aircraft flies at a high angle of attack are beautifully shown.

Therefore, those vortices will show just fine whenever (if ever) a J-20 stop by Houston(with all the humidity) for an air show visit and flying demonstration.

 

[Deino]

wonder how Deino's taking this all in...
D-Deino sir??

Still o.k. ! Thanks for taking care ...

 

[JackyLiu]

Bumping my video because no one has watched it yet.

Sorry to say but has that video stream been accelerated ? It looks too good to be true. Judging from the BGM I suspect it's a work of some fan boy, sort of.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

This one looks more real to me, from 00:30 on I counted about 20 degree per second turn rate. From what I read it's about the same as F-16A.

 

[siegecrossbow]

Sorry to say but has that video stream been accelerated ? It looks too good to be true. Judging from the BGM I suspect it's a work of some fan boy, sort of.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

This one looks more real to me, from 00:30 on I counted about 20 degree per second turn rate. From what I read it's about the same as F-16A.

You are right. But the unaccelerated result is still impressive given the current engine. Also the roll rate during the climb is also good and exceeded 120 degrees per second. Some people on CD even think that the J-20 in the unaccelerated video is a model.

 

[danielchin]

This is a first. At least three J-20s in one shot.

View attachment 32526

not really

 

[Air Force Brat]

Where's the gun port?

AFB says it "ain't got one" that I can see anyway??? I'm not sure what Blitzo is looking at, but gun ports tend to be at least several feet long and longitudinally oriented, have to have enough curvature to allow gun barrel to be elevated above the surrounding fuselage skin.

That "tiny rectangular panel" really does not appear to fit the bill, I could be wrong, but the "primer birds" do not appear to have a gun port, and it would be hard to hide on that paint.

 

[Deino]

not really

Any info on when this image was taken ??

I assume this was at the CFTE showing one 200x demonstrator (top) + two 201x-prototypes ??

 

[Air Force Brat]

I believe it is likely the thing that I circled in red...

and I, being the skeptic, don't think it is, the gun port should be at least a meter, maybe two in length to give the barrel room to clear the airframe, and longitudinally oriented. I just do NOT see anything that approximates a gun door?