J-20 5th Gen Fighter Thread IV (Closed to posting)

Status
Not open for further replies.

by78

General
I found these interesting videos on J-20's maneuverability by an RC model builder. I know nothing about aerodynamics, so I can't judge the validity of the views expressed.

What do you guys think? Deino, Brat, Aeroengineer, Latenlazy? Much appreciate it.

[video=youtube;lw-gug6GdEI]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lw-gug6GdEI[/video]

[video=youtube;_IwyMhbK_rc]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_IwyMhbK_rc[/video]
 

tony0989

New Member
Registered Member
I found these interesting videos on J-20's maneuverability by an RC model builder. I know nothing about aerodynamics, so I can't judge the validity of the views expressed.

What do you guys think? Deino, Brat, Aeroengineer, Latenlazy? Much appreciate it.

[video=youtube;lw-gug6GdEI]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lw-gug6GdEI[/video]

[video=youtube;_IwyMhbK_rc]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_IwyMhbK_rc[/video]


Only engineers in wind tunnel would understand. This is experimental science.
 

latenlazy

Brigadier
I found these interesting videos on J-20's maneuverability by an RC model builder. I know nothing about aerodynamics, so I can't judge the validity of the views expressed.

What do you guys think? Deino, Brat, Aeroengineer, Latenlazy? Much appreciate it.

[video=youtube;lw-gug6GdEI]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lw-gug6GdEI[/video]

[video=youtube;_IwyMhbK_rc]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_IwyMhbK_rc[/video]

An oldie but a goodie. It was a very interesting perspective, but since I saw this video I've come to the conclusion that we shouldn't take away too much from it. After all, the J-20's design also needs to address the transonic and supersonic flight regimes, and clearly needs to address yaw stability to some degree because it has ventral fins.
 
Last edited:

paintgun

Senior Member
I found these interesting videos on J-20's maneuverability by an RC model builder. I know nothing about aerodynamics, so I can't judge the validity of the views expressed.

What do you guys think? Deino, Brat, Aeroengineer, Latenlazy? Much appreciate it.

that thing has alot more power than its weight, compared to the usual thrust to weight of your modern fighter aircraft
plus the control surfaces are different, weight distributions, etcetera

it's a nice toy, that's all
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
that thing has alot more power than its weight, compared to the usual thrust to weight of your modern fighter aircraft
plus the control surfaces are different, weight distributions, etcetera

it's a nice toy, that's all
Amen.

Does not even approximate the weight distributions, stresses, aerodynamics, power, avionics, etc., etc. of the real thing. Whatever it may do, it would have no bearing on, or resemblance to the real aircraft...other than the basic shape and color.
 

by78

General
that thing has alot more power than its weight, compared to the usual thrust to weight of your modern fighter aircraft
plus the control surfaces are different, weight distributions, etcetera

it's a nice toy, that's all

How could you tell the P/W ratio for the RC model is much greater than that of the J-20? As a complete novice, I'm just curious.
 

by78

General
You're talking about fan motors in a styrofoam body light enough to be thrown.

I browsed the RC model maker's website but couldn't find any info. on the J-20 model.

Interestingly, their F-22 model has a T/W ratio of approximately 1.27, which is kind of close to the actual thing.

Apparently, the fan motors generate under 1kg of thrust, and the body + servos + motor weigh around 740g.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top