J-10 Thread IV

M

Midgie

New Member
Registered Member
by78 said:
Not as much as you, Mr. Dunning-Kruger. :p
Click to expand...
That is the funniest thing I have heard in a long time!
So I accept that it is more difficult to wire hard points for fuel+advanced weapons, but is done on other aircraft. I see no reason (except the pylons in a line/delta reason?) why the J-10 wouldn’t be as such also.
 
by78

by78

General
Midgie said:
That is the funniest thing I have heard in a long time!
So I accept that it is more difficult to wire hard points for fuel+advanced weapons, but is done on other aircraft. I see no reason (except the pylons in a line/delta reason?) why the J-10 wouldn’t be as such also.
Click to expand...

It's probably more of a hassle rather than being actually difficult to rig the inboard hardpoints for both fuel and data. I can't be sure if those hardpoints are not plumbed for data because as you've said: absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. But even if we assume they aren't rigged for data, the reasons would be far more mundane than some crackpot theories about delta wings and leading edges and hardpoint alignment and data cables.
 
Scorpio

Scorpio

New Member
Registered Member
What the actually reality of J10D is a fiction of some fanboy. Or actually j10 is modified with limited feature and color coating of sealth
 
Jiang ZeminFanboy

Jiang ZeminFanboy

Senior Member
Registered Member
J-10C s/n 512
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1260144667703771141

WS-10 engines again!

EXzu5CwXQAAdmLH
 
M

MastanKhan

Junior Member
Scorpio said:
What the actually reality of J10D is a fiction of some fanboy. Or actually j10 is modified with limited feature and color coating of sealth
Click to expand...

Hi,

Stealth coating is not a new thing---but it is not like 5th gen stealth. A country may have some of their special mission aircraft get a stealth coating.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top