J-10 Thread IV

[thunderchief]

Yes...but he is not precise enough. Just what does "about one meter," really mean?

Someone could say that 900mm is "about one meter." I would be interested in the exact number.

I too would be interested in exact specifications, but even with this we could conclude that J-10B has more powerful radar compared to other 4th and 4.5 gen medium fighters (Rafale, Typhoon, F-16, Mig-29, Gripen etc ... ) .

 

[Jeff Head]

I too would be interested in exact specifications, but even with this we could conclude that J-10B has more powerful radar compared to other 4th and 4.5 gen medium fighters (Rafale, Typhoon, F-16, Mig-29, Gripen etc ... ) .

I do not think we can conclude that until we know the specifications...including (but not limited to) the size.

 

[b787]

I do not think we can conclude that until we know the specifications...including (but not limited to) the size.

I think that article is a bit propaganda, the F-18Es are in the neighbourhood, with their AIM-9Xs and AESA radar i doubt are not capable, plus Rafale and Su-35 supercruise and have powerful radars, i will say the F-15Js are a bit old and they probably are inferior to the new Chinese Jet, however the F-2s have aesa radars and were upgraded so i doubt Japan has not in the F-2 an equivalent of J-10B

 

[tphuang]

Forget the engines, this is the biggest news of them all For comparison , Irbis-E has 900mm diameter.

I really find that part hard to believe.

 

[Deino]

I think I can only quote myself again:

Guys .. to admit I'm a bit shocked: "Defense Aerospace.com" is closely cooperating - better to say copying - from "WantChinaTimes". Just take a look at the JF-17/FC-1 tread post # 1862

https://www.sinodefenceforum.com/jf-17-fc-1-fighter-aircraft-thread.t5634/page-187#post-340896

So how could You take this piece of BS seriously ???

Simply forget it; it's just a piece of something from here + something from there ... nothing substantial.

Deino

Guys ... calm down !! why do You take this report so serious ???

Deino

 

[Jeff Head]

Thanks Deino...I see now that the original source is, well, as you stated...you know who. LOL!

No sense in arguing about it or considering it seriously.

 

[Equation]

Video of J-15 prototype 555 up close. Is that a old J-10 prototype next to the J-15 prototype ?

It's the J-10A before the B version prototype were made.

 

[Deino]

It's the J-10A before the B version prototype were made.

No, it's the second flying J-10AS prototype numbered '1023' ... the first one was '1021' !

 

[Equation]

No, it's the second flying J-10AS prototype numbered '1023' ... the first one was '1021' !

Still is a J-10A family regardless. It's not definitely a J-10B is what I meant to say.

 

[xion]

hello people of that community'm new in your forum, I'm from Argentina, and spare my country interested in aeronautical material manufacturing, here in the forums of the country, are pure speculation on arrival weapon system to defend the skies the republic.
the fact is that no one knows anything.
what is known is that a delegation of our country was in his country together with the pairs of Air Force and other aggregates.
the issue is next in view of the possibility of the arrival of the FC-1 or jf-17 went everywhere an alleged note makes reappear oportudidad of j10 is known about that?